Dodge Charger Daytona SRT Concept: This EV Has an Exhaust System

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Who else but Dodge could be trusted to design and patent an honest-to-Mopar exhaust system for an electric car? Hell-bent on the concept that their customers are intent on continuing their raucous ways long after the last internal combustion engine has gone silent, Dodge figures their target market wants to announce their presence instead of gliding silently into the room.


As someone smack in the middle of this demographic and holding the keys to a V8-powered Challenger,  I feel compelled to say they may have a point.



A quick browsing of internet comments on just about every EV review – be it sports car, pickup truck, or family crossover – reveals wide swaths of customers who are more likely to hammer the words ‘ELEKTIC JUNK NEDDS MOAR V8’ than they are to embrace the inevitable tsunami of electric vehicles. That’s fine; all hands have an opinion. However, Dodge feels they can play to both sides of the table by building a spiritual successor to today’s Challenger, one which can make an equivalent amount of racket to a burly-chested Hellcat at wide-open throttle.


That’s 126 dB if you’re wondering.


Official power numbers are scarce for the Dodge Charger Daytona SRT Concept, with spox only revealing it packs all-wheel drive and an 800V architecture they’re calling ‘Banshee’. That blunt front end holds a secret in the form of an aero wing ahead of a sharply curved nose, while a so-called ‘eRupt’ multi-speed transmission promises ICE-like acceleration behavior with the attendant rise and fall of engine speed.

Or, at least the simulation of such. Called the Fratzonic Chambered Exhaust, this system uses a series of pipes and chambers to create sound with air, unlike other EVs which simulate noise with speakers and butt-thumpers. Tim Kuniskis, the top dog at Dodge, likened it to a pipe organ in a church that makes music using a similar process. The tone and force of its racket will be dictated by elements like speed load, throttle position, and shift points. Will it be enough to drag V8 fans into the driver’s seat? We’re likely to find out in just a couple of years.


It's clear this concept – and Dodge is very careful to call it a concept, despite its interior and other details looking very production-ready – draws much in terms of its looks from the ’68 Charger, including elements of its front fascia and layout of its interior. Those twin door scallops from that model would look baller but probably ruins airflow, explaining their absence here. You’ll note this car is a hatchback, aiding aero but also opening up a yaffle of cargo space when the rear buckets are folded flat. 

Dodge has generally been shamelessly brazen with their cars over the years and it seems they’re intent on taking that image with them into the EV era. How much of this concept translates to production remains to be seen, of course, but it’s likely we won’t have long to wait to find out – talking heads put this car (or a production version of it) in showrooms by 2024.


[Images: Dodge]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 41 comments
  • Jbawden Jbawden on Aug 19, 2022

    My wife has a model 3 performance, its plenty fast, and while looks are subjective, I think it's nice looking. But, I stand solidly behind my comment that these are soulless appliances. Unprecedented performance cannot overcome what was lost when we remove ICE motivation. For the record I think BEV are great, I've owned one for almost 2 years, but let's stop drinking the unicorn kool-aid and pretending BEV are just as engaging as what they are replacing.

    • See 2 previous
    • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Aug 20, 2022

      Why couldn't an electric car evoke that same sense of mechanical wonder?


  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Aug 24, 2022

    If you watch the recent youtube ad with Tim Kuniskis (which runs one minute and one second and is titled "Electrifying news from the eye of the storm" but doesn't show up in a search [and can't be paused or rewound while it is playing as an ad, because advertisers are stupid]), this thing almost makes sense.

    If you watch the entire reveal clip where they introduce the vehicle, then drive it inside the building, outside the building and then back inside again, all while the exact same sound repeats, it looks absolutely foolish.

    The idea of adding resonators or whatever downstream of the speakers to add a 'real world' component to the sound is interesting, but the sound is still 100% synthesized.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next