Rare Rides Icons: The Lincoln Mark Series Cars, Feeling Continental (Part XII)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Lincoln was in a bad way at the turn of the Sixties, both financially and in terms of its product. The company lost hundreds of millions (adjusted) in the early and middle portion of the decade, when it invested in and then promptly canceled the Continental Division. Attempting a rebound, Lincoln dumped lots more cash into a new unibody platform that was exclusive to Lincoln models. 


The new lineup was on sale from 1958 to 1960 and was unfortunately introduced at the start of a sharp economic recession. However, even after the recession ended Lincoln’s gaudy and overworked styling caused customers to steer clear of Lincoln and purchase Cadillacs instead. Lincoln lost $60 million ($550 million adj.) more. 


1961 heralded the arrival of an all-Continental lineup, the Elwood Engel design that was instantly popular and saved the company. However, the new and streamlined (in all ways) Lincoln lineup spared no room for a Continental Mark series. The Mark slumbered until 1968.


The personal luxury car (PLC) status of the first and second Continental in the Forties and Fifties did not prove sustainable as a Lincoln product. The failure was down to the special nature of the first two Continentals, followed by the lazy gingerbread action that created the Mark III, IV, and V. Elsewhere in the company, the Thunderbird was a hugely successful second-tier PLC. And General Motors continued to market the Cadillac Eldorado and Buick Riviera, joined by the Oldsmobile Toronado in 1966. 


The turn of the calendar into the Seventies would see less expensive PLC offerings arrive, which meant the PLC genre was suddenly accessible to the middle market consumer. It was a new third tier of PLC: Think of the Pontiac Grand Prix, the Chevrolet Monte Carlo, and the Chrysler Cordoba. The PLC was experiencing a resurgence! Much to the chagrin of Detroit, the Seventies would be the last decade where the genre was relevant in any meaningful way. Lincoln needed in on the action, and fast. 

The 1961 Continental made it through the remainder of the Sixties in a single generation. It was an unusual move to keep a platform around for so long, but the Continental was successful and Lincoln needed to save money. Through two refreshes (1964 and 1966) the Continental was updated with more trim, and a new hardtop coupe arrived to compete with the likes of the upscale Imperial Crown Coupe and Cadillac Coupe de Ville. However, even though the new two-door pumped up sales 36 percent upon introduction, it was too big and formal and could not compete with the likes of the Eldorado. 


Lincoln revisited the idea of a halo coupe sold as a Mark: a two-door that would be entirely separate from the Continental line and have a different body. Enter Lee Iacocca, developer and consistent champion of the PLC. The beginnings of the new model occurred in 1965. In September that year, Iacocca was the VP of passenger cars and trucks at Ford. He went to Gene Bordinat, VP of design at Ford, and suggested he should add a Rolls-Royce grille to a Thunderbird. Time for a brief Thunderbird sidebar.


It’s important to bear in mind the Thunderbird was in its fourth generation from 1964 to 1966, and things were still very positive for Ford’s breakout PLC star. It finished the three-year run of its fourth generation with over 236,000 sales. But the fifth generation of 1967 to 1971 was where things went off the rails. 

Suddenly there was a Thunderbird range that included a two-door hardtop, a two-door formal Landau model, and a four-door Landau sedan with coach doors, but no convertible. The new Thunderbird had a different formula than it used since inception: Ford turned Thunderbird into a larger car to pull the model closer to a Lincoln offering, and emphasize luxury. It moved away from unibody construction and switched to a body-on-frame platform.


Early styling was not what the consumer wanted (your author likes the ‘67 to ‘69), and Ford attempted to rectify the issue in 1970 with a gawky coffin nose like Pontiac used. While none were stunning, the hardtop looked much better than the Stutz-like roof of the Landau, and both were better than the awkward Landau sedan with its multi-piece and mandatory vinyl roof. Sales tumbled every single year, from a high in 1967 of 77,976 down to 36,055 in 1971.

Iacocca was keenly aware of the fifth Thunderbird’s failings, and wanted to spread around its development costs via a new halo model. The most important thing for Lincoln to set its sights on at the time was the all-new front-drive Eldorado. Introduced in 1967 on the E-body, the Eldorado (and ‘66 Toronado) were a radical departure for General Motors and ushered in a new era of styling. Compare the stodgy looks of a ‘67 Imperial Coupe to the new Eldorado, for instance.


It was important to associate the new Mark with the right car in Lincoln’s history, which meant the hand-assembled Mark II from the Continental Division. The unibody Mark III through V were not worth inclusion in the family portrait and had been shuffled off to the Home for Forgotten Marks by the late Sixties. The new coupe would wear Mark III badging, and exist as the most expensive model of Continental. As Continental was the only model Lincoln offered at the time, the company was unwilling to let the Mark III stand on its own.

Mark III would make its branding as exclusive as possible, and did not associate itself with Lincoln at all. There was no Lincoln badging on the car body, any of the paperwork from the factory, nor did Lincoln appear on the window sticker. The VIN plate said Continental on it too. Though Ford didn’t admit its association, it was the same strategy used to sell the Continental Mark III (by Lincoln) of 1958. Brochures had a Ford logo in the corner, instead of a Lincoln crosshair.


Branding aside, the Mark III project was a brief one. It was underway from September 1965 to late 1967 and was completed as cheaply as possible. Iacocca returned to the formula he’d used to create the hugely successful new Mustang: Build an exciting new vehicle model using as many off-the-shelf parts as possible, and put it on a platform that’s already been paid for. It worked with the Mustang, it would work with the Mark III, and it worked a couple of decades later with the Chrysler minivans. We’ll pick up there next time.


[Images: Ford, General Motors, Chrysler]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by    subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Michael500 Michael500 on Aug 15, 2022

    Oh my dog- this is one of my favorite cars in human history! A neighbor had a '71 when I was a child and I stopped and gazed at that car every time it was parked outside its garage. Turquoise with a black vinyl. That high beltline looks awesome today!

  • DungBeetle62 DungBeetle62 on Aug 16, 2022

    "Mark III would make its branding as exclusive as possible... "


    Meanwhile, 40 years on down the road every single Lincoln product was "MK _____"

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next