Opinion: Making Sense of the Stellantis Auto Show Decision

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

News broke earlier this week that Stellantis would pull out of auto shows, including the upcoming Chicago Auto Show, for the foreseeable future.


Now, to be clear, that decision is only from the corporate side – local dealers could still participate. We reached out to the Chicago Auto Show folks about that, and have not yet heard back.

We should also note that Stellantis will evaluate whether to attend or not attend any given show on a case-by-case basis.

Having one of the Detroit Three pull out of auto shows leads to ringing of alarm bells. Even if it’s just a temporary move. Especially since it wasn’t that long ago that previous versions of what is now Stellantis were known for putting on elaborate press conferences during media days (especially in Detroit). Even within the past few years, Camp Jeep was a huge attraction at auto shows. Indeed, Camp Jeep will be at the New York Auto Show this spring.

That said, the situation is a bit more complicated than “Stellantis is saving money because it’s in trouble!” and/or “auto shows are dead if automakers don’t want to display there!” and/or “auto shows must cost too much if automakers are pulling out!” and/or “the industry is in trouble a major automaker won’t spend money at auto shows!”

Sadly, we as a society don’t do nuance well.

I think there may be a few factors at play here. There may be lasting effects from last year’s prolonged UAW strike. Stellantis is trying to play catchup with electric vehicles. Stellantis is planning to invest almost $5 billion in its Belvidere, Illinois plant. Most of the company’s brands have little to show right now.

That last one matters a lot, I think. There’s a new Ram truck, but we’re hearing the first drive won’t be in time for Chicago. Dodge’s newest product, the Hornet, launched in March 2023, and the next Charger/Charger Daytona isn’t ready for production yet. Chrysler sells just one model right now. Jeep refreshed the Gladiator and Wrangler but neither are full redesigns and Jeep also killed off two models – Cherokee and Renegade. There’s not much new going on, at least at this second, at Fiat and Alfa.

So why would the company drop millions on a display, plus the liability costs of Camp Jeep, when there’s just not a ton new? Why not pour that money into Belvidere, EVs, and the recovery from any strike-associated losses/increased labor costs?

As for the auto-show angle, I will once again point out that auto shows are for consumers, not media. That said, it’s obviously going to hurt the consumer days if Stellantis isn’t there – even if local dealers step up.

It sounds scary when a big automaker that has long been a major part of auto shows – and seemed to become an even bigger part of shows in recent years as smaller brands sat out – decides to stay home. And unlike Stellantis’ decision to stay out of LA last fall and CES next week, there’s no ongoing strike to use as excuse. It’s over. Though, as noted above, fallout from the strike could be at least partly beyond the decision.

But I am not yet convinced that this move means Stellantis/auto shows/the automotive industry is doomed. Not yet. If Stellantis isn’t back at shows, or spending money on some sort of alternative like the Roadkill Nights event where the Demon 170 was unveiled last year, by this time in 2025, then maybe we can worry.

The world is changing, and that may change how automakers present to the media and consumers at auto shows. Still, I don’t yet think we should freak out about Stellantis taking a break.

I could be wrong. Occupational hazard of writing an op-ed. This could be the canary in the coal mine for a company that has been bailed out twice in my lifetime and always seems to be less stable than Ford or GM. Then again, the investment in a plant 90 minutes from where I am typing this would suggest that starting a Stellantis death watch, at least right now, might be folly.

It’s very easy, especially with today’s discourse environment, to have a hot take about any major news event. Sometimes, that’s appropriate. This news, however, requires a wait-and-see approach.

[Image: Stellantis/Jeep]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 40 comments
  • IH_Fever IH_Fever on Jan 08, 2024

    In a market that is mainly CUV's, pickups, and a few battery powered blobs, why spend any money to go to a show? Once you've seen one, you've seen them all. The one in Houston had such little product the last couple of years they've combined it with the boat show.

    • Jeff Jeff on Jan 08, 2024

      That is interesting that the Houston Auto Show is combined with the boat show. I do see the connection in that if you buy a bigger boat you might need to buy a newer bigger truck.


  • Bankerdanny Bankerdanny on Apr 30, 2024

    I used to love the Chicago show. I went to my first one around 1980 and didn't miss it for another 20 years. After college I would take some vacation time so I could go mid-week when the show was less crowded. But I think I have only gone twice in the past 10 years. There just isn't much that interests me any more and the Detroit 3 started emphasizing the Detroit show over Chicago, so we weren't getting the big debuts like we used to. Ticket prices are ridiculous and food and drink charges are slices of pizza at steak prices.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next