Rare Rides: The 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta, a Sports Car for Luxurious People

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

The last (and only) time Rare Rides covered a Camaro, it was a heavily altered Callaway SuperNatural from the Nineties. While that Camaro was all about performance, today’s Camaro takes a different tack.

It’s a Berlinetta, the Cadillac of Camaros (probably).

General Motors stuck with its second generation Camaro for quite some time, stretching the life of its sub-Corvette sports car from 1970 to 1981. During that time, the Camaro was fettled and updated, and made consistently uglier until it was past due for replacement. Enter another F-body!

New for 1982, the Camaro and its Firebird sibling continued in the F-body tradition. GM went with a major redesign for the Eighties, and focused on bringing the exterior design up to date for both models. There were also efforts to add lightness to the platform for the sake of handling, and curb weight for the third gen Camaro dropped by about 300 pounds, to 3,086 for the lightest versions.

Other important changes for the new, modern Camaro included a hatchback where a trunk was found previously, available fuel injection, and a four-cylinder engine. Speaking of power, engines ranged in displacement from 2.5 to 5.7 liters. There was a singular 2.5-liter I-4, three different V6 mills depending on model year, and two different V8s. The smaller V8 was a 5.0-liter (305), with a 5.7 (350) at the top of the range. Transmissions were three- or four-speed if automatic, and four- or five-speeds if manual.

Carried over from its 1979 introduction on the old Camaro was the Berlinetta trim. A luxury specification, its base engine was a 2.8-liter V6, though spendy fancy people opted for the 5.0 instead. Exterior features found only on Berlinetta included the gold Berlinetta badges, headlamp insets painted in a contrast color to the body, and a unique finned alloy wheel design with gold tone and Berlinetta center caps. Gold effects continued at the rear, with a glistening horizontal trim bar across the lamp assembly.

Inside, there was an upscale cloth interior of high style, more Berlinetta badges, a complete instrument package as standard, carpeted rear wheel arches, and a storage well cover for parcels and your choice of monogrammed beige luggage. Unseen by consumers was additional sound insulation, for a more serene ride.

Luxury Camaro customers would have to move on from Camaro after 1986, as GM saw fit to replace Berlinetta with LT for 1987. This change coincided with the closure of the Norwood, Ohio plant, and left production solely at Van Nuys, California. The third-generation Camaro lived on through the model year 1992 before its replacement by the swoopy fourth-gen seen at the link above.

Today’s Rare Ride Berlinetta is an absolute peach in beige, gold, brown, and tan with stripes. With the 2.8 V6, an automatic, and 22,000 miles, it asks $12,900 in Ohio.

[Images: seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 52 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Nov 08, 2020

    Yes the price is crack pipe, but after the Coyote swap... oh yeah there's the base brakes/suspension/steering/body/wheels/etc. Might as well start with the IROCz. It's 2X the money maybe, but 4 or 5X the car.

  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Nov 09, 2020

    When these were new, they were the joke car that an over coiffed wife of a prosperous local merchant would buy, or a secretary with her first job (in an economy where that job paid enough). Pass. Period. Not even a decent example...the 2.8 with an automatic ? Even back in the day there were a hundred better choices.

  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
Next