Wondering Why the Honda Civic Coupe Has to Die? Coupe Market Share Is Down 60 Percent Over the Last Decade

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

The disappearance of midsize cars, the dismal performance of traditional family sedans, and the eradication of affordable small cars account for the lion’s share of headlines when auto reporters discuss the dwindling American passenger car market. But tucked inside America’s car sector are a handful of fun cars – intentionally impractical two-doors – that muster a mere fraction of the market share they produced just 10 years ago.

In other words, you can’t buy a Honda Accord Coupe or a Kia Forte Koup or a Buick Cascada or a Lexus IS250C in 2020 precisely because buyers of such cars no longer exist in sufficient numbers. Scratch that: buyers of such cars didn’t exist in sufficient numbers when the option was provided to justify offering comparable successors.

How bad is it? We asked J.D. Power’s vice president of data and analytics, Tyson Jominy. And we got answers.

ANCIENT HISTORY

Rewind a full decade. Although convertible market share fell by nearly half between 2005 and 2010, coupe market share was actually stronger coming out of the Great Recession than it was in 2005. 4.4 percent of the new vehicles sold (on a retail basis) in the United States in 2010 were coupes. That’s roughly 500,000 sales in 2010.

Coupe options were plentiful in 2010. There were two-door versions of the Ford Focus and Nissan Altima (that you might prefer to forget), as well as genuine performance cars such as the Hyundai Genesis Coupe and Mazda RX-8, and premium options such as the Cadillac CTS Coupe.

RECENT HISTORY

By 2015, two-door versions of the Focus, Altima, and CTS were gone. So was the RX-8. The Genesis Coupe had just one more year. These were far from the only signs of coupe rejection. Buyers were fleeing. The market share of coupes, J.D. Power’s Jominy tells TTAC, had fallen a tick below 3 percent. Convertible market share, meanwhile, collapsed from 2.2 percent to just 0.7 percent over the course of a decade. Were panoramic sunroofs to blame, or was there a much broader anti-car movement at play?

Undoubtedly, America’s shift away from traditional cars played a role in all car segments. But while other bodystyles saw their collective market share decrease by around 15 percent between 2010 and 2015, coupe market share decreased at more than twice that rate.

TODAY

2020’s first-half presented far worse numbers, however — the kind of figures that tell you why Honda isn’t going to bother with a Civic Coupe after the 2020 model year; why Mercedes-Benz is considering the elimination of two-door Cs, Es, and Ss. Coupe market share through the first-half of 2020 is down to just 1.76 percent, Jominy says.

Convertibles? From more than 2 percent in 2005, droptops now own just a quarter of that: 0.54 percent. 15 years ago convertibles were already a narrow niche, claiming 2 out of every 100 light vehicle sales. Now they account for 1 out of every 200 vehicles driven off the dealer lot.

TOMORROW

Making matters worse is the simple math that makes it difficult for a sector of the auto market to bounce back. Use the much larger sedan market as a harbinger. “Sedans were 32 percent of sales in 2015, but today they are 19 percent, year-to-date,” Jominy says. “That 19 percent is comprised of owners returning to market from a time when one-third of vehicles were sedans. Every year, the returning owner base is shrinking so sales are going to continue to wither.”

Fast forward to 2025. How many automakers do you expect will be keen to wait around for today’s loyal base of coupe buyers – certainly a very thin base if ever there was one – to return for another taste?

Fortunately, the fun car exists in four-door form. Quite plentifully, as you can still access cars like the Subaru WRX and Honda Civic Si at very affordable price points. But we should probably stop pretending that two-door legends we know and love are on solid footing.

[Images: Toyota, Honda]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Driving.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 53 comments
  • Dmulyadi Dmulyadi on Aug 11, 2020

    Hey maybe you do have a good point here. I noticed those old 1990s cars from Japan are now a hot selling thing in USA. Those kids who used to play Grand Turismo on PS1 now have the money to import their dream cars. Maybe there still hope for younger generation. Only hardcore car enthusiast will drive coupe, hatchbacks and gt cars since manufacturer stop selling the car the want and getting too expensive getting any entry level model cars too.

  • MKizzy MKizzy on Aug 12, 2020

    CUV owners were already dismissing 4-door sedans as being too impractical for their needs due to their low stance and roof lines (despite most having roomy back seats now) and "mail slot" trunks (despite growing in size and usability). Remove two doors and require front seat passengers to have the courtesy to exit the vehicle to let others in and out the vehicle and coupes don't stand a chance. With the rare exception, only luxury marquee buyers will soon enjoy the choice of picking from a small selection of sedans, coups, and wagons, leaving the rest of the masses to drive or be driven in high riding cubes on wheels.

  • Ajla The market for sedans is weaker than it once was but I think some of you are way overstating the situation and I disagree that the sales numbers show sedans are some niche thing that full line manufacturers should ignore. There are still a sizeable amount of sales. This isn't sports car volume. So far this year the Camry and Civic are selling in the top 10, with the Corolla in 11 and the Accord, Sentra, and Model 3 in the top 20. And sedan volume is off it's nadir from a few years ago with many showing decent growth over the last two years, growth that is outpacing utilities. Cancelling all sedans now seems more of an error than back when Ford did it.
  • Duties The U.S . would have enough energy to satisfy our needs and export energy if JoeBama hadn’t singlehandedly shut down U.S. energy exploration and production. Furthermore, at current rates of consumption, the U.S. has over two centuries of crude oil, https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/exclusive-current-rates-consumption-us-has-more-two-centuries-oil-report.Imagine we lived in a world where all cars were EV's. And then along comes a new invention: the Internal Combustion Engine.Think how well they would sell. A vehicle HALF the weight, HALF the price that would cause only a quarter of the damage to the road. A vehicle that could be refueled in 1/10th the time, with a range of 4 times the distance in all weather conditions. One that does not rely on the environmentally damaging use of non-renewable rare earth elements to power it, and uses far less steel and other materials. A vehicle that could carry and tow far heavier loads. And is less likely to explode in your garage in the middle of the night and burn down your house with you in it. And ran on an energy source that is readily extracted with hundreds of years known supply.Just think how excited people would be for such technology. It would sell like hot cakes, with no tax credits! Whaddaya think? I'd buy one.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic I just road in a rental Malibu this past week. Interior was a bit plasticity, but, well built.Only issue was how “low” the seat was in relation to the ground. I had to crawl “down” into the seat. Also, windscreen was at 65 degree angle which invited multiple reflections. Just to hack off the EPA, how about a boxy design like Hyundai is doing with some of its SUVs. 🚙 Raise the seat one or two inches and raise the roof line accordingly. Would be a hit with the Uber and Lyft crowd as well as some taxi service.🚗 🚗🚗
  • Dartdude Having the queen of nothing as the head of Dodge is a recipe for disaster. She hasn't done anything with Chrysler for 4 years, May as well fold up Chrysler and Dodge.
  • Pau65792686 I think there is a need for more sedans. Some people would rather drive a car over SUV’s or CUV’s. If Honda and Toyota can do it why not American brands. We need more affordable sedans.
Next