GMC: Moving From the Middle?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

GMC’s an interesting brand. Free of cars from the outset (Sprint/Cabalero notwithstanding), General Motors’ truck brand seems well positioned to turn America’s unquenchable thirst for trucks and utility vehicles into big, big bucks.

For the most part, it has, yet glaring shafts of white space remain in the brand’s lineup. Time for a little rearranging?

Automotive Newsproduct pipeline provides a potential window into an automaker’s future, condensing down-low scuttlebutt, corporate whispers, and all other info into a likely product plan. The outlet recently focused on GM, and one thing stood out.

Does everyone recall the Acadia? The former full-size(ish) crossover that went midsize, even as the nameplates that once kept it company remained on the big side of the spectrum? Looks like it’s not staying put.

Refreshed in a questionable manner (in this writer’s opinion) for 2020, the downsized Acadia first came onto the scene in the middle of 2016, positioned above the soon-to-be-downsized (for MY2018) Terrain. GM soon added the Chevrolet Blazer as a two-row midsize option. While the two CUVs share a platform, the Acadia offers seating for up to 7.

That left the Buick Enclave and Chevrolet Traverse as the topmost rung of the GM crossover ladder. However, AN claims the Acadia’s trajectory will be boomerang-like, with the model returning to its former home in the near future.

Expected to see a redesign in 2024, the Acadia “will move to a larger platform to become the size of a Chevy Traverse and Buick Enclave, as it was in the previous generation,” the outlet wrote. At the bottom of GMC’s product range, a long-awaited subcompact crossover (Granite?) is believed to arrive in about a year.

While the move would stand to make GMC more money on both the high and low end of the lineup, helped along by a new Yukon for ’21, it would also leave the brand with a sizable gap in the middle. Is that space GMC needs to occupy? Depends who you ask.

The Acadia reached new sales heights in 2017, selling more than 111,000 units in the U.S., though the subsequent two years saw sales fall to basically what they were in the two years preceding the model’s size change. The larger Traverse has only seen its fortunes rise over the past half-decade, with the model posting more than 147,000 sales last year. Maybe the Acadia name would be better served affixed to a larger vehicle.

Someone prone to conspiracy theories would suggest that the hollowing out of the middle of GMC’s lineup is all about creating space for an off-road-focused SUV, but there’s no evidence that this is the case. For all we know, the Ford Bronco and Jeep Wrangler will remain the only two contenders in the ring.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 32 comments
  • Ytiradp Ytiradp on Jul 27, 2020

    Very curious when reading this that GMC will finally get a subcompact model for 2022, but will it be something better than the Encore GX? I feel like GMCs version should use the D2XU platform to make it wider and longer than the other subcompacts from GM. GMC should aim the "Granite" squarely at the Countryman with style and customization as the core of the model. The 2.0T should be the smallest engine for any GMC model with the 2.7T as the upgrade. These models are "professional grade" and should have more features akin to Cadillac than Chevy with totally unique interiors. Hopefully GM has been listening to all the critics on their latest products and push the boundaries more.

  • Avnut Avnut on Jul 27, 2020

    I thought GMC made work trucks, not luxury vehicles. Isn't their tagline, "We are professional grade".

    • See 1 previous
    • Luke42 Luke42 on Jul 28, 2020

      They mostly sell luxury trucks. Actual commercial vehicles are purchased on a dollar-and-cents basis, and GMC carries a price premium. I picked up a decade-old GMC Sierra recently to act as a family towbeast, and the "luxury truck" / "professional grade" contradiction actually makes sense in an old-school GM sort of way. If managers are "supposed" to drive Buicks in GM's alternate universe, the boss on a construction site is "supposed" to drive a GMC truck. It works surprisingly well in terms of branding and customer experience. In real life, I got a used truck off of a semi-retired guy, and the truck happens to be a pretty comfortable place to spend time and has the capabilities I was looking for. I have no affinity for the brand -- but I see the fantasy that GM is trying to push, and why it can wring a little extra cash out of some truck buyers.

  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Next