2020 GMC Acadia First Drive - Another AT4 Joins the Lineup

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

GMC has long made a fuss about its Denali sub-brand, which is meant to signify the most luxurious trim available for any given GMC model. GMCs, of course, are supposed to be more upscale versions of Chevrolet trucks and SUVs, even without Denali badging.

Enter a new sub-brand – AT4. First available as an off-road-oriented trim on the Sierra full-size pickup, and intended to become available on all GMC models within the next two years, AT4 is a trim that aims to emphasize off-road ability – or at least look the part.

While the Sierra’s AT4 trim offers mechanical changes that serve to improve the truck’s off-road prowess, the Acadia version is more about off-road looks, all-terrain tires and standard all-wheel drive notwithstanding. GMC knows the Acadia is a suburban shuttle, not a bad-ass off-roader, and has adjusted the AT4 treatment for this vehicle as such.

All 2020 Acadias get a new grille, new fascias front and rear, and a new taillight treatment. Select the AT4, and you’ll receive a unique grille with black chrome accents, other black chrome exterior bits, unique wheels, and unique badging.

While a 2.0-liter turbo four will now be available on the Acadia (late availability), the Acadia AT4 comes equipped with a standard 3.6-liter V6 that makes 310 horsepower and 271 lb-ft of torque. As mentioned above, all-wheel drive is standard, as are all-terrain tires on 17-inch wheels. Twenty-inch wheels are available. The transmission is of the nine-speed automatic variety.

(Full disclosure: GMC flew me to Jackson Hole, Wyoming and placed me in two nice hotels while also offering meals and booze, all so I could drive some of its products. Most of the focus was on full-size trucks, but I got about 40 minutes of seat time in the Acadia AT4).

As noted in the disclosure, I didn’t get a ton of seat time in the Acadia AT4 – just a quick loop that was about 20 minutes or so in each direction. A lot of journalists didn’t even bother with the Acadia, as changes for 2020 are relatively minor, but I hadn’t been in one quite some time, and hey, TTAC needs to feed the content beast.

Given the short length of my drive and the fact that it was on nicely paved roads with gentle curves, as well as the fact that a fair bit of it was in stop and go traffic (even Wyoming has traffic jams. Thanks, tourism), this review will be more of the “quick take” variety.

As you no doubt know by now, the second-generation Acadia moved to the C1XX platform, getting smaller and lighter in the process. The weight loss is noticeable – while the old Lambda-based Acadia seemed to lumber around, this thing feels sprightlier by comparison. It’s livelier to drive.

Livelier to an extent, that is. Despite the drop in mass, the V6 only provides adequate acceleration at best – even foot to the floor during a gap in traffic didn’t move the needle, so to speak. To be fair, Jackson Hole and its surrounding environs are at a power-sapping altitude of around 6,000 feet above sea level. Perhaps the Acadia is a bit quicker at lower elevations.

Acadia’s exterior is a bit of slightly bland boxiness that is only mildly spiced up by the AT4 bits. It’s not ugly, but you’re not going to notice it in traffic. Be prepared to get lost in a sea of anonymous crossovers at the nearest Bed, Bath & Beyond parking lot.

Inside, I remain flummoxed by the weird tray of buttons that operates the trans, and the overall design looks long in the tooth, thought at least the control layout is user-friendly. Materials are nice but don’t exactly scream luxury.

My test vehicle based at $41,300, including infotainment, rear park assist, rear cross-traffic alert, fog lamps, lane-change alert, blind-zone alert, remote start, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, rear-seat reminder, Bluetooth, satellite radio, heated front seats, tri-zone climate control, and hands-free power liftgate. Options included the interior scheme ($1,000), dual sunroof ($1,400), infotainment system with navigation ($995), Driver Alert package ($695, includes front and rear park assist, safety alert seat, lane-keep assist with lane-departure warning, automatic emergency braking, front pedestrian braking, and forward-collision alert), and the paint job ($495). Add another $1,195 for destination and you get a total of $47,080.

That money gets you a decent, semi-upscale crossover that isn’t quite as luxurious as it could be. However, it’s lighter on its feet than it once was, and it lacks in the way of obvious flaws. While the Kia Telluride and Hyundai Palisade offer more for the (similar) buck, the Acadia won’t leave buyers feeling regretful.

[Images @ 2019 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 29 comments
  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Aug 29, 2019

    Have driven plenty of Acadia 3.6/6 speed combos and they are plenty quick enough, especially with some miles on them. The 9 speed should enhance acceleration some provided they get the programming right.

    • Cognoscenti Cognoscenti on Sep 03, 2019

      ponchoman49 wrote: "...provided they get the programming right." This. Unfortunately, as I've personally experienced in every volume GM vehicle in recent years, they will mess up the transmission programming terribly for those of us who actually enjoy driving. The dashpot effect is noticeable and irritating, and in even in what they call "manual mode", an upshift press is a request, not a demand. The last GM vehicle I drove that treated manual mode properly was the G8.

  • Doug Dolde Doug Dolde on Sep 04, 2019

    Thats just butt ugly

  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Next