2018 Toyota 4Runner Limited Review - Old Isn't Always Bad

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey
Fast Facts

2018 Toyota 4Runner Limited

4.0-liter V6 (270 horsepower @ 5,600 rpm; 278 lb-ft @ 4,400 rpm)
Five-speed automatic, full-time four-wheel drive
17 city / 20 highway / 18 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
14.3 city, 11.9 highway, 13.2 combined. (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price
$44,760 (U.S) / $51,320 (Canada)
As Tested
$46,874 (U.S.) / $53,262.50 (Canada)
Prices include $995 destination charge in the United States and $1,915 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.

Age can be a strength or weakness, and in the case of Toyota’s 4Runner, it’s almost certainly the former.

Indeed, I expect that when it comes time for the company to fully update the model, there will be plenty of hand-wringing among 4Runner fans as they worry that Toyota will screw it up. Considering that Jeep just successfully modernized the Wrangler without diluting what made it great, and considering the current 4Runner is already more civilized than the last Jeep, I think the next 4Runner will be just fine. But I understand the concern.

The current 4Runner is an old-school SUV – big, blocky, and tough-feeling. It even has old-school body-on-frame construction and boxy looks with a big ‘ole mean-looking grille and front end. Furthermore, the current generation stretches back nearly a decade.

Changes for 2018 are, fittingly, minimal. The changes consist of two new available options packages and two new trim levels. That’s it.

The 270-horsepower, 4.0-liter V6 remains under hood and the sole transmission remains a five-speed automatic. Drivetrain layouts are as follows: 4×2, part-time 4×4, or full-time 4×4.

Climb in the driver’s seat and you’ll see that all the hallmarks of familiarity are there. The center stack is a mix of blocky design and big control knobs. The quickly-becoming-outdated infotainment system sits housed within.

[Get pricing for new and used Toyota 4Runners here!]

The engine isn’t loud, per se, but it’s noticeable, even at idle, in a way that was once common but has become less so as sound-deadening measures improved over the years. It neither sounds nor feels smooth, which adds to the ruggedness. As for delivering power, it’s a mixed bag. The 4Runner has the guts for around-town driving, but it feels a tad slow to come on boil. You get the sense that the throttle response is tuned for the sensitivity needed when off-roading.

Ride and handling are unsurprisingly truckish. Which is fine – this SUV is built for off-roading. Want something soft with a Toyota badge? Go check out that Highlander across the lot.

Rough around the edges as it may be, the ride isn’t unlivable. It’s just not well-suited to city cruising. At least the steering feels connected to the wheels – there’s only minimal numbness.

Off-road-oriented SUVs tend to command decent money, most likely because in a market flooded with SUVs and crossovers, only a handful are truly capable off-road. That could explain why the high-end Limited trim 4Runner I drove bases at over $42K.

With four-wheel drive, the 4Runner Limited I drove started at $44,760. Standard features included full-time four-wheel drive, 20-inch alloy wheels, skid plates, fog lamps, dual-zone climate control, Bluetooth, Entune, USB, satellite radio, heated and cooled front seats, moonroof, power sliding rear window, push-button start, and keyless entry. Options were limited to automatic running boards, the “Blizzard Pearl” white paint color, and carpeted floor and cargo mats. Total tag: $46,874 including $995 for D and D.

As always with vehicles built with a singular purpose, the value for money equation comes down to how you plan on using it. A lot of today’s SUV buyers would blanche at paying more than $45K for a body-on-frame vehicle that is probably past overdue for a refresh. But those who want or need off-road capability and want something a bit bigger than a Wrangler and cheaper than a Land Rover will find the price just right.

The 4Runner is built to be tough and to handle the outdoors. It should be able to do that just fine. And that’s the point.

Not every vehicle has to be an automotive multi-tool. The 4Runner is an off-road-oriented SUV that happens to be able to haul people and stuff around town as well as any crossover or more “on road” focused SUV.

It does so with an old-school verve that both charms and annoys (although neither the charm nor the annoyance are as pronounced as they were on the last Wrangler). It’s not the best choice for commuting, but it doesn’t punish. This is the same formula that Toyota has used on the 4Runner for well, forever.

Someday soon-ish there will be a new 4Runner, but expect it to remain just as throwback as this one is. It will be a bit more modernized in some ways – a newer and better-looking dash design, and up-to-date infotainment, I’d wager – but the spirit will likely remain.

That’s a good thing.

[Images © 2018 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 102 comments
  • JGlanton JGlanton on Jun 08, 2018

    I test drove a 2018 Limited 4-Runner recently. I owned an 80's 4-Runner for 13 years and appreciate what they bring to the table. After the drive I found out the one I drove costs $48K and asked to see a cheaper $38K SR5 model. The cloth seats in that one were horrible thin foam seats that looked like they belong on the old, cheap 80's model. That was a no-go. Not to mention the stripper interior with few accessories. The salesman said I could take it to a shop and have leather covers put in for $1600 or something. Seriously, on those pancake chairs? on a $38K car???? I ended up getting a loaded Outback for $33K and it's been great for my camping/fishing/kayaking/biking excursions.

  • DougDolde DougDolde on Jul 06, 2018

    I don't like the "new" styling. My 2008 4Runner is a V8, AWD and you really know it's a V8. Bought it new 10 years ago and have 215,000 fairly trouble free miles. Have upgraded shocks to Bilstein and done the brakes. Thats about it. My next one will be a 2008 or 2006 used model V8 AWD. Anything with 100K miles or less would be the pick

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next