As Chrysler Fades Away on the Global Stage, Right-hand-drive 300s Remain in Production

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

On the surface, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles’ Jeep brand is everything a modern-day brand should be. SUVs and crossovers, a looming pickup truck, and no cars. This is what the world wants.

On the opposite side of the coin, Chrysler is the brand seemingly no one, save for North American minivan buyers and a shrinking pool of traditional luxury sedan devotees, wants. Year-to-date, sales of the brand’s two-model U.S. lineup is down nearly 10 percent.

Overseas reports claiming FCA has ended production of right-hand-drive models at its Ontario, Canada assembly plants paint an even grimmer picture, even though the core RHD Chrysler model — the rear-drive 300 — is not, apparently, extinct.

Prompted by an early report in Allpar, numerous media sources are reporting the ceasing of right-hand-drive variants of FCA’s Canadian-made full-size cars. That’s unusual, given that the Dodge Charger and Challenger aren’t produced in right-hand drive (though there’s hopes for a RHD next-generation model).

As for the 300, Lou Ann Gosselin, head of communications for FCA Canada, told TTAC, “We do continue to build the Chrysler 300 RHD at the FCA Brampton Assembly Plant.”

If the RHD 300 was defunct, it would have spelled the end for the brand in several markets, including the UK, South Africa, New Zealand and Australia. However, those countries never really took to the brand in the first place, and many are already phasing it out. Chrysler sold just 26 Chrysler 300 sedans in Australia in September, and 210 in all of 2017 so far. In contrast, China’s Great Wall sold 36 vehicles in the kangaroo-laden country last month. In the UK and Ireland, five Chrysler-badged vehicles went to non-conformist customers in August. (The brand disappears in the UK after 2017.)

Suffice it to say, Chrysler isn’t a big draw in other continents. The automaker knows this, and it’s the reason the brand, along with Dodge, is pulling out of numerous overseas markets while the growing Jeep and Alfa Romeo brands fill the FCA void. Earlier this month, FCA announced the end of both brands in South Africa, as reported by Wheels24.

“FCA will say a fond farewell to two of the mainstay car brands, with the Chrysler and Dodge vehicle ranges no longer being available locally,” FCA South Africa CEO Robin van Rensburg stated. “This unfortunate situation has arisen from our principals in the USA no longer building Chrysler or Dodge vehicles in Right Hand Drive configuration.”

It’s this statement that lit the fire under the RHD Chrysler 300 rumors. Down Under, FCA’s Aussie division refuted the report by the South African division.

In a statement reported by Car Advice, Alessia Terranova, manager of public relations for FCA Australia, said, “I am not at liberty to comment on South Africa’s decision. What I can tell you is that Australia will continue to sell the right-hand drive Chrysler 300 as an ongoing product in our lineup. In relation to Dodge, at this stage, this brand is represented as a parts and service operation only.”

As opposed to other countries, the Aussies do seem keener on keeping the Chrysler brand alive. Last year, FCA Australia head Steve Zanlunghi told Motoring, “The way I see it there are still good, profitable opportunities for the Chrysler brand,” he couldn’t give assurances for any point past the 2017 model year.

“I wouldn’t say I am not committed,” Zanlunghi continued. “We are committed. I am committed at least through 2017. Let’s see what happens, let’s see if there are any other products we might be able to add.”

The only new products arriving from Chrysler — two crossovers — won’t appear for some time yet, and it isn’t known whether Aussies are champing at the bit for an opportunity to drive a Pacifica (currently unavailable Down Under). Meanwhile, FCA is eager to have the 300 replace the defunct RWD Ford Falcon and Holden Commodore in Australian police fleets.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 16 comments
  • Dilrod Dilrod on Oct 23, 2017

    What a sad end to Chrysler. I think about all the sharp luxury models they had through the 80s, followed by hideous machines starting in the 90s (same as Oldsmobile). The 200 & 300 were the best they could do? We don't need to beat the dead 200 horse anymore, but every time I see a 300 I think it belongs in a Batman movie, all dark and aggressive. Just my view from the cheap seats, but I think if they'd played their cards right they could've held the market share Hyundai & Kia started taking in the early 2000s. All those pretentious mid-size sedans with fake wood and leather seats should have been "imported from Detroit" instead.

    • See 7 previous
    • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Oct 24, 2017

      @mike978 "A carcass with a soaring stock price." Oh, yeah! Thanks to the Trump Effect on the Stock Market. Bless you, President Trump! Did you see where the Stock Market went today? We're having to take accelerated Lump Sum cash payments from our retirement fund because we can't get it all out before the mandated 10-year period. Finally! Some great news for Americans!!!

  • Akear Akear on Oct 27, 2017

    With the possible exception of Boeing, US manufacturing is disappearing from the global stage.

  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next