$56,410 Per Job? GM Could Get a Hefty Government Payout For Assembly Plant Investment

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It looks like the prospect of getting a partial payback for its investment could have hastened the deal reached between General Motors Canada and its autoworkers’ union.

The automaker could have up to 40 percent of the money invested in its Canadian operations handed back by the Ontario and Canadian governments, according to a report in the Globe and Mail.

If the full amount is realized, it means a government cash injection of $56,410 per autoworker.


There was already talk of hands-off government intervention before the two sides reached a last-minute agreement on September 19. Unifor president Jerry Dias mentioned the looming changes to the federal government’s Automotive Innovation Fund (which moves from low-interest loans to grants), claiming the switch would help seal a deal with GM Canada.

After 3,900 union members ratified the $554 million (CAD) deal, GM Canada claimed it was “in discussions with the federal and Ontario governments toward potential support agreements to help optimize the competitiveness of our Canadian operations for the future.”

The deal sees unfinished full-size pickups sent to the automaker’s Oshawa plant for final assembly, and product diverted from Mexico to its St. Catharines engine and transmission plant. Workers covered by this collective agreement are employed at these two plants, plus a Woodstock, Ontario parts facility.

According to the Globe, the federal fund and Ontario’s Jobs and Prosperity Fund could hand GM Canada a total of $220 million. That’s assuming the full sum of the investment qualifies for the two programs, each offering up to 20 percent.

One industry source told the publication, “you can get 20 percent by showing up.”

If the remaining two Detroit Three automakers know this, Unifor’s job of securing investment becomes much easier. Among the Canadian facilities seeking upgrades or new product are Fiat Chrysler’s Brampton plant and Ford’s Windsor engine facility.

Both governments paid a total of $13.7 billion to GM Canada and Chrysler Canada in 2009 to keep the companies afloat. The federal government’s contribution to GM was $7.23 billion.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 23 comments
  • An innocent man An innocent man on Sep 27, 2016

    Every time I'm away a while and come back, someone else is gone. Now where's PCH101? Alex?

  • Scwmcan Scwmcan on Sep 28, 2016

    Only m is the globe and mail got ir wrong, the investments agreed to in the contract do not hinge on government money, gm has agreed to put this money into the plants, and and are now contractually obliged to do so as the contract has been ratified, there is no clause saying conditional on government aid. They are however in talks for future investments, now if the government wants to give them money they don't have to that is another matter altogether and would no surprise me if they did (and GM isn't likely to refuse it are they?)

  • SCE to AUX I am generally anti-union.To win over the workers, the UAW has to convince them that:[list][*]The court of public opinion (internet, social media, local/national news) is insufficient to air their gripes (it's not).[/*][*]The Company is in sustained violation of established workplace regulations for comfort, safety, and well-being (unlikely).[/*][*]Paying union dues is worth the artificial bump in pay and benefits (it's not).[/*][*]The UAW can actually protect their jobs (they can't).[/*][*]Adding labor contention via unionization is worth the risk of the company relocating the plant to a more friendly location (it's not).[/*][*]Strike pay over the holidays is great compensation for all the free time you get (it's not).[/*][*]The UAW leadership won't put themselves first (they will).[/*][/list]
  • ToolGuy You say V8, but I only see 3 spark plug wires? Pretty sure this is a V3.
  • ToolGuy The Supercharger in the last picture: Is it 2B, or not 2B?
  • 1995 SC "But your author does wonder what the maintenance routine is going to be like on an Italian-German supercar that plays host to a high-revving engine, battery pack, and several electric motors."If you have to ask...
  • Loser I love these MN12 vehicles. We had a 92 Cougar, my dad had an 89, mom and brother both had T-birds. Wife and I still talk about that car and wish they still made cars like these. It was a very good car for us, 130,000 miles of trouble free and comfortable driving. Sold it to a guy that totaled it a month after purchase. Almost bought a 97 T-bird the 4.6 when I found out it was the last of them but the Cougar was paid for and hard to justify starting payments all over.
Next