Will GMC's Brand Makeover Include a Jeep Fighter?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

We’ve all seen the ads. Glistening GMCs plying the streets of Manhattan as Eminence Front swells in the background, broadcasting loud and clear to urban car buyers that we’re here, we’re trucks or truck-like vehicles, get used to it.

Boosted exposure is a big part of GMC’s plan to grow sales and brand recognition, but the next phase of the automaker’s revamp could see it take on Jeep.

GMC’s plans for the future are starting to become clear, and while it looks like a small crossover is out, a small SUV could be in. Speaking about the company’s two-phase plan, GMC brand chief Duncan Aldred told Automotive News that Jeep’s runaway success might need to be countered.

“I do think GMC has got the brand equity and brand character in many respects to give customers a really good alternative to Jeep products,” Aldred said.

Industry sources told Automotive News that GMC is in the early stages of crafting an SUV that will borrow the frame of the GMC Colorado midsize pickup. Analysts agree that Jeep is the most likely target for the automaker, though sources say the rumored SUV wouldn’t arrive until 2020 or later.

GMC sales hit an 11-year high in the U.S. last year, so the newfound exposure seems to be working. The high-end Denali line, which Aldred pushed in order to boost the brand’s profitability, now makes up 20 percent of sales.

Still, it’s new products that grow excitement. The GMC Terrain and its Chevrolet twin, the Equinox, are expected to shrink in size when the next generation bows in 2017. Those models will ride atop the Chevrolet Cruze platform and could source the 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder from the Malibu.

Plans for a smaller crossover inspired by the Granite concept vehicle fell though, possible because sales could overlap with the Chevy Trax and Buick Encore. Aldred wants it, but it seems that General Motors executives aren’t keen on the idea.

[Image: © 2015 Mark Stevenson/The Truth About Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 94 comments
  • Baconpope Baconpope on Jul 19, 2016

    GMC needs to get back in the RV business--a place where they truly excelled. Outside of the Oldsmobile Banshee and the ZR2, GM has never tried to produce a "serious" off-roader. The diesel Canyon could make a stellar platform for an off-roadable RV with lots of room for profitability.

    • Hummer Hummer on Jul 19, 2016

      Huh? GM produced the H3 remember? Front & rear lockers, full time 4WD w/ 2 speed transfer case standard. Additionally they farmed out two amazing off-roaders from AM General to sell. These vehicles laugh at the doll-up package that was the ZR2.

  • Maserchist Maserchist on Jul 20, 2016

    A very attractive grille on the articles picture only has 3 big things wrong with it (sung to the music of The Grinch who stole Christmas) I repeat " G. M. C. ".

  • Jalop1991 You do realize, you can get a $1 lease payment on any vehicle from any manufacturer, for any term.Just make a big enough "down payment". But hey, at least you have bragging rights, right?I keep seeing this insanity being marketed. "Polestar, only $399 month!" (with a huge "down payment"). Are people really this stupid?$7500 to enter into a lease just so you can say "but the payment is only $559!"??? Good God. And when some car full of Kia Boyz slams into you and totals it as you drive it off the lot, what then? The dealership will laugh at you as they count your $7500 and you stand there on the street looking like a fool.Why do people who lease, put any money down on a depreciating and very easily totalled asset like a car?
  • EngineerfromBaja_1990 A friend from college had its twin (2003 Cavalier 2dr) which fittingly re-named the Cacalier. No description needed
  • Lorenzo GM is getting out of the car biz, selling only trucks, EVs and the Corvette. They're chasing the bigger margins on lower volume, like the dealer trying to sell a car for $1 million: "I just have to sell one!"
  • SCE to AUX "The closeness of the two sides"56-44 isn't close, if that's what you mean.
  • Jalop1991 expensive repairs??? I've heard that EVs don't require anything that resembles maintenance or repair!So let me get this straight: as EV design and manufacture technology, and as battery technology, improves over time, the early adopters will suffer from having older and ever-rapidly outdated cars that as a result have lower resale value than they thought.And it's the world's obligation to brush their tears away and give them money back as they realize the horrible mistake they made, the mistake made out of some strong desire to signal their virtue, the mistake they could have avoided by--you know--calmly considering the facts up front?Really? It's Tesla's obligation here?If Tesla continued to manufacture the Model 3 (for example) the same way it did originally when the Model 3 was introduced, Tesla would not have been able to lower prices. And they wouldn't have. But they invested heavily in engineering in order to bring prices down--and now the snowflakes are crying in their cereal that the world didn't accommodate their unicorn dreams and wishes and wants and desires.Curse the real world! How dare it interfere with those unicorn wishes!
Next