Tokyo Motor Show 2015: The Full-size Lexus LS-FC Is A Helluva Boat For A Flagship

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

Lexus took the wraps off its LS Concept in Tokyo on Tuesday to showcase the automaker’s big plans for its flagship sedan.

The car — which is about as long as a 1995 Cadillac DeVille Concours — boasts a hydrogen power plant to drive all of its wheels, an “advanced human interface” to recognize hand gestures, and a spindle grille the size of Rhode Island.

The concept shows the direction Lexus designers may take for its future full-size sedan, including floating L-shaped lights in front and back.

According to the automaker, many of the car’s styling cues could make it into the production version of the LS, which is slated to arrive sooner rather than later to catch up with competitors such as Audi, Mercedes-Benz and BMW, who’ve all introduced new versions of their full-size sedans within the last four years.

“Lexus wants to surprise and evoke emotion with its distinctive design and forward-thinking technology. For us, it is more than just a car, and we should exceed conventional imagination. The LF-FC expresses our progressive luxury and high-tech vision of a not so distant future,” Tokuo Fukuichi, Lexus International President, said in a statement.

In its concept, Lexus’ sedan exhibits more coupe-like proportions than the automaker has shown. The gently sloping windshield and long hood aren’t reciprocated in the rear quarter (which borrows a lot from the IS, I say).

Although the hydrogen powertrain and massive tail lights may not make it into a future sedan, it’s likely that interior details and the Lexus LS-FC’s overall shape could survive into the production model.







Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Nov 02, 2015

    Herringbone wood trim, like an old Victorian house! Other than that, I'd leave the rest. Too close to the Mirai.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Nov 13, 2015

    There's a 1959 Invicta calling, it wants its grille back. DO NOT ANGER THE '59 BUICK!

  • Cprescott Sounds like people are trying to find reasons to justify expensive golf carts AFTER the fact instead of building into networks for this purpose. I can see someone wanting to recharge their batteries with solar, but to purposely pull energy from the grid and to put the battery through more cycles to act as a power brick seems like an expensive option.
  • IBx1 Any "cloud" hardware (cloud is just someone else's computer) that gets mandated into e-waste like this should have its software open-sourced by law so it can continue to be used at the owner's choice.If you have one of these and they don't give you a refund, issue chargebacks for as many months of your subscription as will add up to the cost of the device.
  • Zerofoo This is my worry with ALL in-car technology, including tech provided by auto OEMs. What happens when the manufacturer of your car decides not to provide updates or repair parts for the giant tablet stuck to your dashboard that runs your HVAC controls? This is a way different problem than the manufacturer opening up the CAD files for the water pump in your car to the aftermarket.
  • Carson D Has the energy storage fire in San Diego burned itself out yet?
  • JMII I think most are missing the point. This is not to power your house, the way I read it the concept is store electrons when production of them is not in demand, IE: over night. Then when everyone walks up and turns on the blender, coffee maker, toaster, TV, etc and electrons are suddenly in high demand you can sell them back from the storage location which is your EV just sitting in the garage. This way the grid is not overwhelmed. It could work, you would be paid to let someone "borrow" your electrons at peak until you could recharge during downtime. Due to surge / demand pricing you would buy low and sell high. I see this working best for people working from home or accessing a plug at work. After all your vehicle spends 90% of its time parked doing nothing and going nowhere. Why not get paid for that idle time? A simple app would could be programmed to cut off the transfer at a predetermined level, lets 30-50% charge so you could still drive home.The lack of outside the box thinkers on this site is getting depressing. Everything regarding EVs is always the worst idea ever 🙄
Next