Piston Slap: Impala Vs. 300?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Joe writes:

Hi Sajeev,

As the resident car enthusiast in family, I’d appreciate your input on the following situation I’ve been asked for my input on.

My parents (in their late 60s) are currently looking to replace one of their two vehicles with a new small crossover. Their current vehicles are as follows:

– 2000 Chrysler 300M w/sport package, 80k miles, virtually all city miles


– 2003 Chevy Impala, 110k miles, virtually all highway miles (my dad was a salesman and bought the car for peanuts after he used it as a company fleet vehicle)

Both cars are in excellent condition and are maintained faithfully by my retired father, including religious fluid changes and twice-yearly waxings. Both garage-kept from new and no rust. As expected with two older vehicles, there have been a few issues over the years:

300M:


– Transmission was replaced early on (20k miles) under warranty after getting stuck in second gear; no further issues with new tranny


– Weak A/C that needs to be recharged yearly to maintain cold air


– Various minor electrical problems that my father addressed himself: window regulators, power seat motor

Impala:


– Something with the steering rack that was replaced by the dealer


– Again, weak A/C that needs to be recharged yearly

The value of both cars is about equal. The car that is kept will likely be kept for quite a while and driven very little by my father who only drives about 2,000 miles per year at this point.

I honestly don’t know which car to recommend they keep. My father wants to keep the 300M because it has lower miles, and it’s much better equipped and nicer to drive than the Impala. However, the lower miles on the 300M have been much harder city miles, and the Impala is three years newer. Plus I feel that any future repairs on the Impala will be cheaper to fix than on the 300M. Quite the quandary.

Would love your opinion on which vehicle would be more reliable for the long haul.

Sajeev answers:

Considering the 300M is a somewhat impressive sports sedan and that Impala is generally a horrid place to do business…AND your Dad will barely use it, the Chrysler 300 is the hands down winner.

(balloon drop, flashing ChryCo message on-screen, audience applause)

I’d change my tune if the 300M had more miles. And if your Dad drove more often. It’s still a safe bet that the Impala is a far superior value proposition in many other ownership scenarios. Oh, and before I forget, my apologies to that one guy on TTAC who loves him some W-body Chevy.

My parting shot: why punish Mom and Dad with the dark ages of General Motors’ design if, more than likely, the superior Chrysler LH stablemate’s style/design won’t completely fall apart under Dad’s care?

Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • That guy That guy on Jun 12, 2013

    Another thing, somewhat related, it's too bad Daimler ruined Chrysler. Their products from the late 1990s were vastly superior to what GM and Ford were putting out.

  • Slantsixbuzzinaway Slantsixbuzzinaway on Sep 10, 2013

    My friend has a 96 LHS w/3.5L with just under 200k miles, still works well for him, but the car did have to have the timing belt replaced after the original snapped. I have a 2000 Impala LS w/3.8L with 207k miles, this car runs and drives very well. I like both, but still lean toward the Impala due to the sheer abundance of parts both new and used. If the Impala is a 3.4L, then Chrysler all the way.

  • Redapple2 Common sense, kind, judicious, sober, good -ole -joe -from -scranton has:-opened the main oil reserve.-opened the northeastern oil reserve.-killed sanctions so IRAN can sell oil.-asked nice/prohibited UKR from bombing Russian oil facilities.But-Limited US oil drilling permits.-Killed pipeline construction-Cranked up EPA laws.Yeah. He has our best interests in mind. The (US Army budget sized) student loan forgiveness (round 4) and open southern border shows me this.
  • JOHN One is for sale on an ebay car donation site.https://www.ebay.com/itm/305579991767?itmmeta=01HYHVJ49MCC6HEWQY5AX9MX85&hash=item4725fca2d7:g:k9cAAOSw5V5mThFw
  • Scott So they are losing hundreds of millions of dollars and they are promising us a “Cheaper EV”? I wonder how that will look and feel? They killed the Fiesta because they claimed that they couldn’t make a profit on them and when I bought the first one in late 2010 they couldn’t deliver the accessories I wanted for it! Then I bought a 2016 Fiesta ST and again couldn’t get the accessories for it I wanted. They claimed that the components were going to be available, eventually. So they lost on that one as well! I don’t care about what they say anymore. I’ve moved on to another brand.
  • Michael S6 CX 70 or 90 will not be on my buying list. Drove a rental base CX 90 and it was noisy and the engine noise was not pleasant. Ride was rough for a family SUV. Mazda has to understand that what is good for Miata isn't what we expect in semi luxury SUV. My wife's 2012 Buick Enclave has much better Ride and noise level albeit at worse gas millage. Had difficulty pairing my phone with Apple CarPlay
  • Michael S6 What is the metric conversion between one million barrels and the number of votes he expects to buy.
Next