Used Car of the Day: 1997 Audi A6 Quattro

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

We haven't featured that many Audis here, especially a 1997 Audi A6 Quattro.


This one is a high-mileage car -- 215,000 on the clock. It's got an automatic trans and apparently has been well maintained. There are some cosmetic issues -- mostly small dents, rock chips, and wear and tear on the seats.

As is often the case with older cars, the check engine light is on and won't clear even though the needed repair has been made. Oh, and the parking brake doesn't work.

This one is yours for $4,000. Click here to get a better look.

[Images: Seller]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 49 comments
  • Wjtinfwb Wjtinfwb on Jan 15, 2024

    $4000 to buy it, another $4000 a year to keep it running. If 4 grand is your budget, a used Domestic with 100k + or even better, a 12-year-old Camry with 200k is a much better bet. You'll have issues, but they won't be $4000 at a time issues.

  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Jan 15, 2024

    At what age is a car essentially worthless and should be kept in the family? This Audi seems to fit that, but what is the newest car that would? It's definitely not this.

    • See 1 previous
    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Jan 15, 2024

      So in general its tough to say because its become obvious you will own nothing and be unhappy isn't just a joke meme. If someone is like myself and plans to keep a daily at least ten years, your best hope would be the end of the early 2010ish product cycle but with a mature drivetrain. So Toyonda products come to mind since they run long cycles on their bread and butter models, Volvo believe it or not because they kept the Whiteblock going till 2015ish and P3 (2006) is an improved P2 (1998) which itself is an improved P80 (1991) but FWD Volvo can be a headache without a reliable indy. Ford's Panther of course, GM W-body, probably GM trucks or Ford trucks running the 4.6 or 4.0. I don't know enough about Chrysler/Daimler/Fiat but have been anecdotally told about Hemis north of 200K on LX cars so maybe those? The Daimler/Chrysler 3.7 can put up serious miles as well as I have seen them in the flesh as such.

      But its probably going to be for naught because the Forces of Evil™ seem to already be leveraging the also evil insurance industry to price out the proles from driving what they already own. If I am in league with satan, this seems like a logical solution to me because it solves the problem of prole freedumb while also giving an out to those pushing it: "oh its not us [the gov't] or [political party/movement], its the X". The only legal move I can see is classic/antique registration, and I forsee them limiting or closing that loophole over the next two decades.

      For the past few years I've been saying everyone needs to scoop up a classic/antique car now and register it as such, while rules vary among the states generally speaking the catch is limited use and the example be over a certain age. Because its a state registration/inspection issue, it will take years for the majority of states to limit or close this loophole. There could be a scenario where no one will insure them (or states will not accept new registrations) but the limited use becomes an advantage with the policy because by and large its very profitable and from a capitalist perspective why drop high margin policies?

      Both of my Volvos cost zero registration, $327 for both with full coverage, the catch is one day a week general usage plus parades, meets, shows. Although I just had it out last Tue when my daily was in the shop, generally speaking a convertible in Western PA is good for six months of real use if you're lucky so the C70 is easy to keep within the rules. The 244 I treat the same, because I'm not driving a circa 1966 platform around snow and hills and risk damaging it. I usually alternate them in the nice weather, because of them I only drove about 3,500 miles from Dec 2022 until November 2023 in the daily (then drove a lot in Nov-Dec but still under 5K for the year).

      To anyone reading this, if I had room I'd be Panther shopping right now and then a parts hoarder for said Panther. The last of them are almost up to 15 years which is the threshold for some state's classic status. Trucks will unlikely ever go the classic/antique route no matter their age, outside of some garage queens they all will be used up. Most of the 90s stuff worth messing with is already gone but a cherry JDM/domestic SUV or JDM/Euro car/wagon would also be a nice buy if you can handle one. The 200 Volvos have become collectable (and kinda pricey when clean) but the 700/900 have not, and they are fundamentally similar in drive line and build quality.






  • Billyboy The Big Three, or what used to be the Big Three, have been building sedans in the FWD unibody mold since the 80’s to compete with the Japanese - and failing. The Taurus was the only decent attempt, and even that fizzled out after a few years. Back to GM, There’s no reason to choose a Malibu over a Camry or Accord for normal buyers. The story was the same when it was the Citation, Celebrity, Lumina, and Impala, as it was the same with Ford and Chrysler. GM knows this, as does Ford, and doesn’t care - and rightfully so. Better to cede this time-worn commodity segment to others and focus to where the market has shifted.
  • CanadaCraig You are not wrong. Or a dummy for that matter. I also think it's foolish of GM to kill off the Malibu. That said... I think there needs to be full-sized plain jane sedans for sale. And there are none. And haven't been for a long time. A basic BIG car. With room for six. Bench seat and all. Nothing fancy. And a low price to go along with it. I would buy one.
  • OCcarguy Back in the 1980s the Mitsubishi Cordia was one of my favorite cars. I would love to see them make cars we could get excited about again.
  • Chris I dislike SUVs. I think they are clunky looking and not much in the handling department. I'll take an Audi A4 or BMw three series or even a VW Jetta over any SUV. It I need more interior room for a shot time, I'll rent something bigger.
  • Amwhalbi I have a sedan and an SUV, and for pure driving and riding enjoyment, I'll pick my sedan every time. But yes, SUV's are generally more practical for all around usage, particularly if you have only one vehicle. So I think the perfect answer is the sedan hatchback (a la the last Buick Regal) which can still yield the drive and ride or a sedan, yet provide a greater modicum of practical, accessible cargo capacity. Most of the sedans made could (with minor styling changes) easily become 4 door hatchbacks. Oh, yeah, I forgot - Americans don't like hatchbacks, even if they do in Europe...
Next