GM Eying Oddly-Shaped EV Batteries to Improve Cooling and Performance

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Despite all the innovation in the electric vehicle world, battery packs haven’t deviated from the two primary shapes they’ve always taken. Automakers generally employ either a rectangular or cylindrical battery pack, which limits their ability to position them in some places on the vehicle. General Motors might be looking to buck that trend, as a recently discovered patent application shows the automaker is looking at less traditional shapes for its next-generation battery packs.


The patent application covers a couple of new battery shapes, including one that looks like an “L” and one with more of a “C” shape. GM will eventually have several battery manufacturing facilities, giving it the ability to have almost complete control over the design and build processes.


Beyond positioning in the vehicle, the batteries’ new shape will give GM the ability to add a cooling channel between packs for better performance and range. General Motors said current cooling methods can create an uneven temperature situation and noted that the condition can lead to premature battery wear. The novel battery shapes haven’t really been seen outside of small devices like smartphones, so it will be interesting to see what kind of numbers GM can draw out of its designs.


GM’s funky battery shapes are interesting, but they’re far from the only innovation coming out of the space. Solid-state batteries are moving forward, and automakers have figured out alternative battery chemistries to lower costs. Better cooling aside, the new battery shapes may enable smaller, less expensive EVs from GM, depending on how they’re employed, though it’s worth noting that patent applications don’t always lead to real-world products.


[Image: Chevrolet/General Motors]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Tassos Jong-iL Tassos Jong-iL on Mar 20, 2024

    Funky battery for funky shaped car.

  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Mar 20, 2024

    Next, they need to figure out how to protect the batteries in a fender-bender. Any damage to the battery tends to total the car, while ICE cars are still drivable, even with moderate damage.

  • Billyboy The Big Three, or what used to be the Big Three, have been building sedans in the FWD unibody mold since the 80’s to compete with the Japanese - and failing. The Taurus was the only decent attempt, and even that fizzled out after a few years. Back to GM, There’s no reason to choose a Malibu over a Camry or Accord for normal buyers. The story was the same when it was the Citation, Celebrity, Lumina, and Impala, as it was the same with Ford and Chrysler. GM knows this, as does Ford, and doesn’t care - and rightfully so. Better to cede this time-worn commodity segment to others and focus to where the market has shifted.
  • CanadaCraig You are not wrong. Or a dummy for that matter. I also think it's foolish of GM to kill off the Malibu. That said... I think there needs to be full-sized plain jane sedans for sale. And there are none. And haven't been for a long time. A basic BIG car. With room for six. Bench seat and all. Nothing fancy. And a low price to go along with it. I would buy one.
  • OCcarguy Back in the 1980s the Mitsubishi Cordia was one of my favorite cars. I would love to see them make cars we could get excited about again.
  • Chris I dislike SUVs. I think they are clunky looking and not much in the handling department. I'll take an Audi A4 or BMw three series or even a VW Jetta over any SUV. It I need more interior room for a shot time, I'll rent something bigger.
  • Amwhalbi I have a sedan and an SUV, and for pure driving and riding enjoyment, I'll pick my sedan every time. But yes, SUV's are generally more practical for all around usage, particularly if you have only one vehicle. So I think the perfect answer is the sedan hatchback (a la the last Buick Regal) which can still yield the drive and ride or a sedan, yet provide a greater modicum of practical, accessible cargo capacity. Most of the sedans made could (with minor styling changes) easily become 4 door hatchbacks. Oh, yeah, I forgot - Americans don't like hatchbacks, even if they do in Europe...
Next