2017 Mini JCW Clubman: More Power and Grip to Lure the Crossover Set

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Having been a player in the small car category since its 2001 reboot, Mini now seeks to take on the burgeoning premium sporty compact segment with this, the new John Cooper Works Clubman.

With sales of the Mini brand reaching only nine-tenths of its 2013 high in the U.S. last year, will this model bait new customers into the brand’s retina-searing showrooms?

Like most siblings, the newest offspring gets some hand-me-downs but enjoys some new toys not shared with its older brothers.

The JCW Clubman squeezes 228 horsepower out of its turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder, along with a relatively brawny 258 lb-ft when compared to its more mundane brethren. This power will be shuttled through a standard all-wheel-drive system provided by Mini’s in-store brand of ALL4. “Nyah-nyah”, says this Mini to its older Clubman brothers, who make do with 134 hp in Cooper trim or 189 hp in slightly more expensive Cooper S trim.

Looking closer, the JCW Clubman reveals its parent’s ability to recycle items used by its older siblings. The same two transmissions will be on offer — a standard six-speed manual and an optional eight-speed automatic — while the unique barn-doored body is adorned with the typical frippery associated with JCW editions. This means 18-inch wheels are along for the ride plus a more aggressive body kit that suggests better engine and brake cooling. The new kid is hefty like his brothers too — around 3,500 lbs. Still, with the newfound power on tap, it’s expected to complete the 0-60 mile per hour dash in about 6 seconds.

Subcompact crossover sales more than doubled in 2015, stirring up the marketplace and giving automakers an entry point with younger buyers. A survey by Strategic Vision Inc. suggests the no-kids/under-45 customer set accounts for about a quarter of the sales in this segment (compared to less than 20 percent for the industry overall). Buyers also are surfacing from the other end of the spectrum, such as Boomers who no longer need to schlep kids around in a large crossover or SUV. No doubt Mini wants a piece of that pie, too.

Think the term “subcompact crossover” and “Clubman” shouldn’t be combined in the same sentence? You’re right, of course, in terms of height: Buick’s Encore towers nearly 10-inches above the Clubman. However, this new JCW is within an inch of length and width (168.3 inches & 70.9 inches, respectively) when compared to the Encore, a model which, it must be noted, counts many of its buyers as conquests from other brands. Mini’s own Countryman is about five inches taller than the Clubman, but is half a foot shorter in length.

The new model, then, gives Mini sales staff yet another all-wheel-drive option to pitch at the rapidly increasing chorus of customers who want their traction with a dash of action.

The 2017 Mini John Cooper Works Clubman is scheduled to go on sale this December.

[Images: BMW of North America]


Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 31 comments
  • Quentin Quentin on Sep 22, 2016

    I wonder if they will offer the JCW tuning kit for the regular S models... and how much will it be. They offer it for the hardtop versions.

  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Sep 22, 2016

    I bet this car is totes amazeballs to drive!

  • Billyboy The Big Three, or what used to be the Big Three, have been building sedans in the FWD unibody mold since the 80’s to compete with the Japanese - and failing. The Taurus was the only decent attempt, and even that fizzled out after a few years. Back to GM, There’s no reason to choose a Malibu over a Camry or Accord for normal buyers. The story was the same when it was the Citation, Celebrity, Lumina, and Impala, as it was the same with Ford and Chrysler. GM knows this, as does Ford, and doesn’t care - and rightfully so. Better to cede this time-worn commodity segment to others and focus to where the market has shifted.
  • CanadaCraig You are not wrong. Or a dummy for that matter. I also think it's foolish of GM to kill off the Malibu. That said... I think there needs to be full-sized plain jane sedans for sale. And there are none. And haven't been for a long time. A basic BIG car. With room for six. Bench seat and all. Nothing fancy. And a low price to go along with it. I would buy one.
  • OCcarguy Back in the 1980s the Mitsubishi Cordia was one of my favorite cars. I would love to see them make cars we could get excited about again.
  • Chris I dislike SUVs. I think they are clunky looking and not much in the handling department. I'll take an Audi A4 or BMw three series or even a VW Jetta over any SUV. It I need more interior room for a shot time, I'll rent something bigger.
  • Amwhalbi I have a sedan and an SUV, and for pure driving and riding enjoyment, I'll pick my sedan every time. But yes, SUV's are generally more practical for all around usage, particularly if you have only one vehicle. So I think the perfect answer is the sedan hatchback (a la the last Buick Regal) which can still yield the drive and ride or a sedan, yet provide a greater modicum of practical, accessible cargo capacity. Most of the sedans made could (with minor styling changes) easily become 4 door hatchbacks. Oh, yeah, I forgot - Americans don't like hatchbacks, even if they do in Europe...
Next