Top Gear Lays Plaudits on Hyundai Ioniq 5 N

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Alert members of the B&B know we don’t tend to put much stock into “Of the Year” awards, for reasons with which you lot are intimately familiar. Witness the spectacle of Motor Trend awarding the Blazer EV its SUV of the Year trophy as Exhibit A of our feelings.


Nevertheless, an EV with its wick cranked to 641 horsepower tends to get out attention – as it did the crew of Top Gear across the pond.


Setting up as the most powerful – and perhaps most expensive – Hyundai made to date, the Ioniq 5 N is the first electric vehicle to fly the brand’s N flag and takes to the streets with what’s being reported as a reasonably credible simulation of a twin-clutch automatic transmission. It’s of no small hit of irony that the N crew deliberately infused some of the DCT’s hiccups and burps in attempts to retain an engaging rather than sanitized driving feel. The same goes for its simulated torque curve that’s meant to be a reasonable facsimile of turbocharged gasser engines. There’s even a tachometer which will allow drivers to run headlong into a rev limiter if they forget to shift up.


All of this surely is part and parcel of why Top Gear selected the thing for its plaudits. We all know the fastest way through a quarter mile in an EV would be with an uninterrupted wave of power – immediate admittance to what feels like an infinite well of torque, in other words – but we also know that gearheads aren’t the most rational people on this planet. Most of us crave engagement from our vehicles, explaining why the manual transmission lives on in some of the best cars even if its automatic-equipped counterpart is faster on paper.


Perhaps this is why we chose to spill some digital ink on an award we’d normally glaze over like day-old Krispy Kreme donuts. The new Ioniq 5 N is a tacit admission that people who buy vehicles with outsized performance creds do indeed like some measure of aural (and tactile) feedback whist caning the thing around their favorite circuit. Perhaps entertaining frivolity will become a category in these types of evaluations. 


After all, it already is in ours.


[Image: Hyundai]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 19 comments
  • SCE to AUX Here's a crazy thought - what if China decides to fully underwrite the 102.5% tariff?
  • 3-On-The-Tree They are hard to get in and out of. I also like the fact that they are still easy to work on with the old school push rod V8. My son’s 2016 Mustang GT exhaust came loose up in Tuscon so I put a harbor freight floor jack, two jack stands, tool box and two 2x4 in the back of the vette. So agreed it has decent room in the back for a sports car.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh so what?? .. 7.5 billion is not even in the same hemisphere as the utterly stupid waste of money on semiconductor fabs to the tune of more than 100 billion for FABS that CANNOT COMPETE in a global economy and CANNOT MAKE THE US Independent from China or RUSSIA. we REQUIRE China for cpu grade silicon and RUSSIA/Ukraine for manufacturing NEON gas for cpus and gpus and other silicon based processors for cars, tvs, phones, cable boxes ETC... so even if we spend trillion $ .. we STILL have to ask china permission to buy the cpu grade silicon needed and then buy neon gas to process the wafers.. but we keep tossing intel/Taiwan tens of billions at a time like a bunch of idiots.Google > "mining-and-refining-pure-silicon-and-the-incredible-effort-it-takes-to-get-there" Google > "silicon production by country statista" Google > "low-on-gas-ukraine-invasion-chokes-supply-of-neon-needed-for-chipmaking"
  • ToolGuy Clearly many of you have not been listening to the podcast.
  • 1995 SC This seems a bit tonedeaf.
Next