IIHS: Here's Why We Don't Crash Test at More Than 40 MPH

by Chris Teague

Published: March 19th, 2024

iihs here s why we don t crash test at more than 40 mph

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety occasionally updates its testing methods to keep pace with a rapidly evolving automotive industry, but there’s one thing that hasn’t changed with the new tests: Crash speeds. In a recent YouTube video, the IIHS detailed why it hasn’t increased crash-test speeds above 40 mph despite the fact that most highway drivers routinely hit much higher speeds.

Raul Arelaez, the VP of the IIHS Vehicle Research Center, said that the organization's testing speeds align with the median speed of real-world crashes involving severe injuries.

“We know there are crashes that are more severe, but we are capturing the bulk of the total number of crashes. Most crashes are very low severity,” he said in the video.

Another reason for keeping speeds where they are is the fact that impact force doesn’t increase in a linear relationship with speed. Arbelaez pointed out that increasing speeds from 40 to 50 mph would bump crash energy by 50 percent and said that focusing on higher crash-test speeds could come at the expense of safety at lower speeds.

The IIHS updated its testing methodology in 2024, making it more difficult for vehicles to earn a Top Safety Pick or Top Safety Pick +. Pedestrian and crash prevention systems must now perform well in both day and nighttime, while headlights have to earn “Good” or “Acceptable” scores for the vehicle to qualify for an award. Additionally, the organization recently released a report showing that most advanced and semi-autonomous driving assistance systems fail to adequately monitor driver behavior and safety.

[Image: IIHS via YouTube]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#IIHS #CrashTesting #VehicleSafety

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 12 comments

Blueice on Mar 19, 2024

One can not call or even email this worthless organ.

Like Reply
- ToolGuy on Mar 19, 2024
  
  That's what she said?
  
  2
Daniel J on Mar 20, 2024

I'm not sure I entirely get this. Locally, when I see most of the major injuries and deaths in an accident, it's a drunk driver going the wrong way on a freeway going 60mph that fails to stop or even slow down. Wouldn't it be a good idea for car companies to invest in saving lives at higher speeds?

Like Reply
- EBFlex on Mar 21, 2024
  
  It’s not the automakers job to out engineer stupidity
  
  1

Recent Comments

28-Cars-Later Mileage of 29/32/30 is pretty pitiful given the price point and powertrain sorcery to be a "hybrid". What exactly is this supposed to be?
MRF 95 T-Bird I own a 2018 Challenger GT awd in the same slate gray color. Paid $28k for it in late 2019 as a leftover on the lot. It’s probably worth $23k today which is roughly what this 2015 RT should be going for.
Mike978 There is trouble recruiting police because they know they won’t get support from local (Democratic) mayors if the arrests are on favored groups.
FreedMike I'm sure that someone in the U.S. commerce department during the 1950s said, "you know, that whole computer thing is gonna be big, and some country is going to cash in...might as well be us. How do we kick start this?" Thus began billions of taxpayer dollars being spent to develop computers, and then the Internet. And - voila! - now we have a world-leading computer industry that's generated untold trillions of dollars of value for the the good old US of A. Would "the market" have eventually developed it? Of course. The question is how much later it would have done so and how much lead time (and capital) we would have ceded to other countries. We can do the same for alternative energy, electric vehicles, and fusion power. That stuff is all coming, it's going to be huge, and someone's gonna cash in. If it's not us, you can damn well bet it'll be China or the EU (and don't count out India). If that's not what you want, then stop grumbling about the big bad gubmint spending money on all that stuff (and no doubt doing said grumbling on the computer and the Internet that were developed in the first place because the big bad gubmint spent money to develop them).
MRF 95 T-Bird The proportions of the 500/Taurus-Montego/Sable were a bit taller, akin to 1940’s-50’s cars in order to cater to crossover buyers as well as older drivers who tend to like to sit a tad higher.