The Saturn Contingencies

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

GM’s “different kind of car company” is furiously trying to forge a future amid plummeting sales and little outside interest in buying the brand. Saturn’s Franchise Operations Team has been meeting with GM executives in hopes of creating some kind of strategy for the brand’s dealer network. According to Automotive News [sub] the options were narrowed down at a meeting last week, and after further refinement they should be presented to Saturn dealers later this week. When asked if this spelled the end for the Saturn name, Franchise Operations Team member Todd Ingersoll told AN “everything is fluid. You can’t commit to any option.” But he also indicates that “you don’t need four options to kill a brand.” So what’s really going on?

As with most GM decisions these days, the critical factor is finding a way forward that will appeal to the federal subsidy masters. Since GM’s viability plan calls for concentration on Chevy, Cadillac, Buick and Pontiac, most Saturn dealers see their fate as sealed. And they say that the perception of Saturn as a dead brand walking is hurting sales. “I’m really surprised we’re still selling the cars we’re selling,” says one Texas Saturn dealer. He notes that customers often express concern over warranty and parts availability issues that could arrise if the brand is axed. This concern is doubtless being fuelled by GM’s decision, reported at Ward’s Auto [sub] to cancel Saturn’s 30-day return policy.

And this compounding effect could radically reduce the chances that Saturn will survive. “We haven’t seen a dramatic difference in their business,” notes GM’s Mark LaNeve. “Obviously, the quicker we can clarify our direction with Saturn in line with the viability plan, the better.” Ultimately though, GM seems to be keeping its options open until the last possible minute. Ingersoll notes that GM’s decision for Saturn may be disclosed within hours of filing the new viability plan on the 17th. Maybe they think a buyer will come along between now and then. After all, self-deluding optimism seems to be quite the popular survival mechanism these days.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • ReGZ_93 ReGZ_93 on Feb 10, 2009

    The main reason I bought my Astra was because it was the anti-saturn. I drove an ION back in 20006, and that piece of plastic craptastic truly set new lows in materials and build qualities. I'm still amazed that there were that many people willing to buy something like that. Buy the things they did, at like 20,000 a month. Mind blowing.

  • Michael Curwood Michael Curwood on Feb 10, 2009

    "Today Saturns are just another GM car, nothing special. Too late to change that image" Exactly. There is nothing unique about Saturn and now they have to try and make a name for themselves amoungst already established brands - Last year there was too much competition and this year there's not enough of a market. I spoke to a dealer yesterday and their comment was, "we just want them to make up their minds so we can move forward". Deep down, dealers know whats going to happen.

  • JMII I did them on my C7 because somehow GM managed to build LED markers that fail after only 6 years. These are brighter then OEM despite the smoke tint look.I got them here: https://www.corvettepartsandaccessories.com/products/c7-corvette-oracle-concept-sidemarker-set?variant=1401801736202
  • 28-Cars-Later Why RHO? Were Gamma and Epsilon already taken?
  • 28-Cars-Later "The VF 8 has struggled to break ground in the increasingly crowded EV market, as spotty reviews have highlighted deficiencies with its tech, ride quality, and driver assistance features. That said, the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200 with leases at $429 monthly." In a not so surprising turn of events, VinFast US has already gone bankrupt.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Farley expressed his belief that Ford would figure things out in the next few years."Ford death watch starts now.
  • JMII My wife's next car will be an EV. As long as it costs under $42k that is totally within our budget. The average cost of a new ICE car is... (checks interwebs) = $47k. So EVs are already in the "affordable" range for today's new car buyers.We already have two other ICE vehicles one of which has a 6.2l V8 with a manual. This way we can have our cake and eat it too. If your a one vehicle household I can see why an EV, no matter the cost, may not work in that situation. But if you have two vehicles one can easily be an EV.My brother has an EV (Tesla Model Y) along with two ICE Porsche's (one is a dedicated track car) and his high school age daughters share an EV (Bolt). I fully assume his daughters will never drive an ICE vehicle. Just like they have never watched anything but HiDef TV, never used a land-line, nor been without an iPad. To them the concept of an ICE power vehicle is complete ridiculous - you mean you have to STOP driving to put some gas in and then PAY for it!!! Why? the car should already charged and the cost is covered by just paying the monthly electric bill.So the way I see it the EV problem will solve itself, once all the boomers die off. Myself as part of Gen X / MTV Generation will have drive a mix of EV and ICE.
Next