The Amphicar: The Little Floater With Big Plans

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

We seem to have sunk into an amphibious mode this morning, although we got our feet wet earlier this week with that seminal and still most-built floating car, the VW Schwimmwagen. But Hanns Trippel saw civilian potential, and convinced the Quandt Group (BMW) to back production of his Amphicar design. Although it floated well, enough, the business case for it didn’t.

Somewhat surprisingly, it wasn’t VW based. Trippel wanted more power, to move through the water at somewhat more than the Schwimmwagen’s snail pace. Not that water skiing was likely, given challenges of pushing a blunt car body with its wheels adding drag.The new 1147cc engine from the Triumph Herald had all of 42 hp, which gave the Amphicar a top speed in the water of all of 8 mph. That’s the problem in a nutshell.

The Amphicar’s main market was the US, not surprisingly. Ze Amerikans are always suckers for a new fad, no? Well, the Germans’s optimism was somewhat misplaced: production plans were set at 20k floaters per year. Only 4000 Amphicars were sold in the end, over a seven year period from 1961 to 1968.

The best way to sum up the Amphicar is with this owner’s quote: “It’s not a good car and it’s not a good boat”.

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Redmondjp Redmondjp on May 03, 2010

    I grew up in the Tri-Cities (Kennewick, Pasco, Richland) in eastern WA. Before the I-182 bridge was completed, providing a direct link from Richland to west Pasco, one had to drive all the way to Kennewick to cross over the Columbia River and then double back on the other side. Short story long, I remember one family that had (IIRC) two of these in their carport overlooking the river on the Pasco side. The dad used one daily to commute, across the river, to the Hanford site north of Richland. Saved him maybe 1.5 hours per day vs. driving the long way around. Sadly, I never got to personally witness this. And these cars came w/o a rudder--you use the steering wheel; the front tires steer both in and out of the water!

  • JamesGarfield JamesGarfield on Dec 18, 2013

    Wow, does this bring back the memories. I rode in one of these things many years ago. My dad was friends with a guy down in South Texas, who had a Studebaker dealership (which should tell ya how long ago that was), and they also sold Amphicars. For years I thought the Amphicar was made by Studebaker, until that childhood memory error was corrected by more recent research. But yes, they were really cool machines. The little 1145cc 4-cylinder inline made 'acceptable' performance, if you weren't in a big hurry. It had a smooth, hydrostatic transfer of power from the wheels to the propellers. You would drive slowly into the water on wheel power, then move the lever and the wheels stopped and the propellers started. The front wheels were the 'rudder', which made the Amphicar steer quite differently than a normal boat. There was an extra lever on each door when when pulled, engaged a watertight gasket in the door sills. These little 'boats' still had various little seepages, which required the use of an electric bilge pump. The exhaust was high-mounted on the trunk lid to keep it out of the water. The hood ornament was the red-green navigation light as on a boat. And as another poster commented here -- yes, the freeboard was not muchl, less than 12 inches below the window sills. I remember sitting in the back seat and dragging my fingertips in the water. So yes, as a boat, you'd definately want calm waters. However, I have read of some Amphicar fanatics operating with the windows closed and the convertable roof up, taking them through some fairly heavy seas. More guts for them than this old guy has, fur sure. We tooled around Laguna Madre in that Amphicar one quiet afternoon, back in the late 60's. I haven't confirmed this but was told, that there was a tragic sinking of an Amphicar near this time (reason unknown), that killed a young family, and this was a death blow to the market. But yes, there are several of these unique machines still around and running. They had steel 'hulls' and rusted -- an inconvienence for a car, but death to a boat. Anyway, thanks for the memory trip.

  • 1995 SC I wish them the best. Based on the cluster that is Ford Motor Company at the moment and past efforts by others at this I am not optimistic. I wish they would focus on straigtening out the Myriad of issues with their core products first.
  • El Kevarino There are already cheap EV's available. They're called "used cars". You can get a lightly used Kia Niro EV, which is a perfectly functional hatchback with lots of features, 230mi of range, and real buttons for around $20k. It won't solve the charging infrastructure problem, but if you can charge at home or work it can get you from A to B with a very low cost per mile.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
Next