By on February 22, 2017

2016 Ford Mustang GT

Perhaps we’ve finally hit a point where the old ways actually are the best. Gizmo-centric problems seem more important than ever to J.D. Power and Associates in this year’s dependability ranking, which examined problems experienced over the last 12 months on three-year-old vehicles and highlighted electronic accessories as a major issue.

So, a car that has a rock-solid drivetrain still might not make the grade due to a wonky multimedia system. A good example of this was J.D. Power’s chosen pickup, the Ford F-150. While the Ford achieved top marks for the quality of its interior, exterior, and electrics, the Toyota Tundra possessed vastly superior powertrain reliability.

It’s a similar story with the minivan segment. While the Toyota Sienna was given the crown, the Chrysler Town & Country actually had fewer reported problems in every area except the powertrain — and even that was still rated above average. It makes you wonder how much of the long-term quality being tested here is influenced by J.D. Power’s initial quality categories, which it splits into separate mechanical and “design” groups. (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • ToolGuy: Ford Mustang GT driver death rate is almost 2X higher than Ford Mustang driver death rate:...
  • 2ACL: @Corey Lewis According to multiple sites, the 2007 Altima V6’s MSRP range spread from $24K (SE 6MT) to...
  • slap: I’ve bought four wagons new – including my newest one. And no – a CUV is *not* better for...
  • ToolGuy: Here is *driver* death rate per million registered vehicle years [years not miles]:...
  • Oberkanone: 300 plus horsepower, rear wheel drive, coupe, Mustang. Manual transmission, 10 speed automatic, your...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber