By on September 14, 2018

classic car

Mister Steve writes:


There seems to be a trend, at least among the younger crop of auto writers, to anthropomorphize an automobile based on its looks. It seems like you can barely get through a review of a new car without mention of automotive anthropomorphism: “angry eyes” or “ugly mouth” to describe styling. Definitely not how I recall descriptions from the likes of David E. Davis, Jr. or Chubby Chedder.

My theory for this is that they’re the generation that grew up during the Cars movie franchise. Seeing as I’m one of the “olds” who grew up when this wasn’t a thing, I could be wrong.

(Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • ttacgreg: Ride height! I just gave my well preserved 2000 Corolla to my nephew for his kid to drive. My 43 year old...
  • ttacgreg: The flat two cylinder Citroën 2CV comes to mind.
  • APaGttH: She is a pretty 10 footer. Tires are mismatched which is a bit of a red flag on what else has been ignored...
  • Robbie: GM is that annoying website that sometimes shows up when you want to check your gmail…
  • johnnyz: I’ve always wondered if those exhaust stacks on the little red truck are real?

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributors

  • Timothy Cain, Canada
  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States