By on March 31, 2017

2017 Audi Q3 Quattro Daytona Grey - Image: © Timothy Cain

Some cars genuinely suck. There is essentially no price at which, for instance, wooden ride quality and inept handling and nonexistent acceleration and uncomfortable seats and disappointing fuel economy are worth the asking price. There are simply far too many decent alternatives for a vehicle such as, oh, I don’t know, the Mitsubishi Mirage.

Some cars, however, only suck in the context of their respective MSRPs. Take the Ford Flex we reviewed recently as an example. Though showing signs of age, it’s still a fine family hauler. But at the $50,000 as-tested price, the Flex is uncompetitive.

Then there’s this 2017 Audi Q3. Perhaps it’s an acceptable machine at its $33,875 entry price. But optioned up to $44,150, the aged Q3 may be guilty of simply resting upon the laurels of its four-ring badge.

Does the 2017 Audi Q3 suck, or does it only suck when it strays out of Single-A ball into the Major Leagues? (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • SCE to AUX: I don’t understand how people think a mind-altering drug is OK to use in potentially dangerous...
  • EBFlex: Once again Jeep does it right. But this time, it shows how pathetic the 202 Explorer refresh really was. Ford...
  • FreedMike: Good question.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird: The 63-91 Jeep Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer SJ were never offered as a three-row so maybe they were...
  • Kyree: The Arteon and Stinger are also sporty, elongated-looking liftbacks (although the Arteon is quite...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber