By on March 31, 2017

2017 Audi Q3 Quattro Daytona Grey - Image: © Timothy Cain

Some cars genuinely suck. There is essentially no price at which, for instance, wooden ride quality and inept handling and nonexistent acceleration and uncomfortable seats and disappointing fuel economy are worth the asking price. There are simply far too many decent alternatives for a vehicle such as, oh, I don’t know, the Mitsubishi Mirage.

Some cars, however, only suck in the context of their respective MSRPs. Take the Ford Flex we reviewed recently as an example. Though showing signs of age, it’s still a fine family hauler. But at the $50,000 as-tested price, the Flex is uncompetitive.

Then there’s this 2017 Audi Q3. Perhaps it’s an acceptable machine at its $33,875 entry price. But optioned up to $44,150, the aged Q3 may be guilty of simply resting upon the laurels of its four-ring badge.

Does the 2017 Audi Q3 suck, or does it only suck when it strays out of Single-A ball into the Major Leagues? (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • slavuta: Corey, this picture deserves a special blog post on TTAC https://tadviser.com/images...
  • slavuta: Oh, not that one. I take Niva, 2103 or 2106 Check this https://tadviser.com/index.php /Company:AvtoVAZ...
  • slavuta: So, I was right all this time that these nannies !will! kill you. In Russia they even had a saying for this...
  • SoCalMikester: sounds like it would be perfect for trips to laughlin. the 40 is pretty desolate
  • ajla: Are the production issues sorted out on the Bronco then?

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber