By on April 23, 2011

Last week we discussed a rumor that suggested the new 2013 Malibu’s rear legroom might be compromised as a result of its redesign, and in the original post I included the official manufacturer numbers for rear legroom in the “big six” midsize sedans. This led to an interesting discussion in our comments section, and the comparison apparently caught the attention of at least one boss of a global automaker’s US operations. This exec (who has admitted to being a daily TTAC reader), wrote in to point out that there are two different SAE standards for measuring rear legroom, the L33 “Effective legroom” test, in which the front seat is placed at the appropriate distance for a driver in the 95 percentile of height, and the L34 “Maximum driver legroom” test, in which the front seat is placed all the way before measuring. As a result of our conversation, I thought I’d share a comparison of the six best-selling D-segment sedans using a different (and hopefully less-confusing) metric: combined legroom. You can move the seat, but you can’t run away from this metric…

(Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • SaulTigh: My first car, a ’78 Lebaron coupe had a vinyl top. It was rotting away and causing the roof below to...
  • tankinbeans: I want to say the most recent car I’ve seen with the eye-searingly ugly vinyl roof was one of the...
  • Jeff S: highdesert–My nephew ordered the lift before the Covid-19 and it is a nice. It is heavy enough to lift...
  • tankinbeans: It was old about 2 hours after it started. The only retroish car that I still want is the Challenger. I...
  • tankinbeans: I kind of like that design of that light. It looks like they’re going for Pegasus’ wings....

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Matthew Guy
  • Timothy Cain
  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber