By on November 29, 2011

In 1990, you could give your BMW salesman $24,650 and drive off the lot in a 325i coupe weighing 2,811 pounds and equipped with a 168-horsepower engine and 5-speed transmission… or you could hand $14,895 to your Oldsmobile salesman and drive off the lot in a Cutlass Calais International Series coupe weighing 2,823 pounds and equiped with a 160-horsepower engine and 5-speed transmission. Ten grand more for rear-wheel-drive, eight more horses, 12 fewer pounds, and a blue-and-white hood emblem? I had forgotten all about the Quad 4-powered Cutlass Calais International Series until I ran across this forlorn example in a California self-service wrecking yard last week. (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • Yaemish: Exactly this. His argument is one an MBA would make to increase profit margin. The difference would only be...
  • Vulpine: @staticboy: “Ajla, the only thing your argument implies is that “big=dangerous”. Maybe not to those...
  • trackratmk1: Nikola World cancelled because they have nothing to show, stock goes up. GM warns that deal is not done...
  • trackratmk1: Fair enough, I can agree with you that relative to time, cars really aren’t more expensive...
  • SCE to AUX: “…and had what everyone assumed was some of the most advanced battery and hydrogen tech in...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Matthew Guy
  • Timothy Cain
  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber