By on April 18, 2012

It’s strange how the passage of a few decades makes the mid-70s Corolla seem like a much better car than it actually was. Granted, it was quite a car for the time, with a combination of price, reliability, and fuel economy that Detroit and Europe couldn’t touch… but if we take ourselves out of the mindset of the Malaise Era and fast-forward our vehicular expectations maybe ten years, this generation of Corolla turns out to be a cramped, underpowered, noisy econobox that lasted maybe 150,000 miles (if you lived in the rust-free Southwest). (Read More…)

Recent Comments

  • msquare: In her position she shouldn’t have even bought the Boston Benz. Want a Benz convertible? Go find a...
  • MitchConner: Saw a guy getting out of one in downtown Palo Alto once. Had the narrow fronts on the left side and the...
  • MitchConner: Everybody who knows me knows I love buying cars — so a few would ask me to help them get the best...
  • TCowner: My first car was a 78 Olds Cutlass with the 260 V-8, we called it the Nutless Cutlass. Thing was super...
  • jmo: To give some perspective as to how expensive Mercedes used to be, in 1984 the cheapest stripper E190 started at...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber