Bailout Watch 526: Supplier Bailout Fails Dramatically

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The $5 billion bailout of Detroit’s suppliers has “flopped” according to Automotive News [sub]. Even though the bailout funds were made available in mid-March, money has yet to be disbursed even to firms which have been blessed with OEM approval. Problems seem to be traceable back to the decision to use Citigroup to manage the funds. “All our paperwork has been in for weeks,” says one supplier CEO. “But Citibank does not return phone calls or e-mails.” With reports of Citi being “overwhelmed” by supplier applications (aka anyone owed money by GM or Chrysler) and rampant government red tape, what do Citi, GM, Chrysler and the Treasury say about the unfolding boondoggle? Nada. “A Treasury spokeswoman said the government has no information on how the car companies have disbursed the money or to whom. She referred all questions to GM and Chrysler.”

Luckily for suppliers, the supplier bailout is no longer the best taxpayer-funded way to claim what is due to them. Chrysler has received $1.49 billion from its government-funded Debtor-In-Posession financing to pay suppliers. That sum that should cover 88 percent of its supplier debt. According to supplier lobbyists, qualifying firms are likely to fight hard for their portion of that money. After all, supplier firms had to pay a 3 percent fee to have receivables paid earlier than the typical 45 days and 2 percent to have their receivables guaranteed under the initial bailout program. No such premium exists for bankruptcy payments. Unfortunately for Chrysler suppliers, these payments don’t make up for business lost to the Pentastar’s production shutdown.

Meanwhile, GM is moving up a payment to suppliers, according to Automotive News [sub]. 1,500 North American suppliers will be paid on May 28 instead of June 2, in a move aimed at keeping suppliers viable going into a likely GM bankruptcy. No word on the amount to be paid, but with GM looking at a long summer production shutdown, it probably won’t be enough to keep many suppliers from going out of business. Faced with the current Chrysler shutdown and a long summer with little to no production and cashflow, suppliers are now requesting direct aid from the federal government. Citing the apparent Citi mismanagement, government red tape and the Tier-1-only requirements of the current bailout effort, suppliers tell AN [sub] they need direct assistance to prevent rampant bankruptcies.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • Robert.Walter Robert.Walter on May 11, 2009

    If you think the 3% discount for immediate payable, or the 2% discount for 50 days payable (up from 45 days normally) is bad... Chrysler wanted suppliers: - to sign a Retraction Agreement cancelling all claims; - stay in the program 12 months (life of the original program); - 10% holdback for potential disputes (with no explanation of when or how the 10% would be returned to the supplier); - potentially requiring the suppliers to stay a supplier until the end of each program they supplied; - if the supplier sold in a currency other than USd ,then the supplier had to convert to USD at an undetermined exchange rate... The whole deal was just so odeous that I know more than one supplier that was scared away...

  • Willman Willman on May 11, 2009

    @buzzliteyear wins the cigar! -I think it was Citibank that was one of the stress-test banks that was ultimately in trouble.

  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Next