Understanding the Role of NACS in the Future of EV Charging

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff
Photo credit: Sheila Fitzgerald / Shutterstock.com

The North American Charging Standard (NACS) has played a central role in electric vehicle (EV) charging since 2012. Initially developed by Tesla, NACS is known for its dual capability of supporting both Alternating Current (AC) and Direct Current (DC) charging via a compact plug design. This versatility enables the system to deliver up to 1 megawatt (MW) of power for DC charging, catering effectively to the needs of EVs.

Tesla's influence in the EV market in North America has contributed to NACS becoming the predominant charging standard. This is largely attributed to its widespread use in Tesla vehicles and the extensive network of Tesla charging stations throughout the United States.

Standardization and Compatibility Efforts

In July 2023, the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE International) embarked on an initiative to standardize NACS as SAE J3400. This effort focuses on codifying elements such as plug connections, charging speeds, reliability, and cybersecurity. The move towards standardization is pivotal for achieving uniformity across EV charging systems.

Other existing standards in the EV charging domain include the J1772 for Level 1 and Level 2 AC charging, and the Combined Charging Standard (CCS) for DC fast charging. Notably, the CHAdeMO standard is still used for certain models like the Nissan Leaf, despite being gradually phased out.

Wider Adoption Among EV Manufacturers

Tesla's strategy to open up NACS to other companies has led to its acceptance by several leading EV manufacturers. Prominent automakers such as Ford, General Motors, Rivian, Volvo, Polestar, and Mercedes-Benz have plans to integrate NACS charge ports in their EV models beginning in 2025. This transition also entails providing adapters for existing EV models to access Tesla's Supercharger network.

While some manufacturers are in the process of evaluating NACS for potential adoption, others have not yet disclosed their plans regarding this standard.

Implications for Public EV Charging Networks

Although NACS is gaining traction, the CCS standard remains crucial in public EV charging networks, especially given the requirements for federal infrastructure funding. As a result, the U.S. EV charging landscape is expected to accommodate both NACS and CCS standards concurrently for the foreseeable future.

Network operators like EVgo are adapting by adding NACS connectors to their stations, ensuring compatibility across different standards. Moreover, EV manufacturers that are adopting NACS are facilitating access to Tesla's Supercharger network through both in-vehicle support and adapters.

Enhancing EV Adoption and Charging Infrastructure

The wider acceptance of NACS, together with Tesla's integration of CCS support, is set to substantially expand the EV charging infrastructure. This development is crucial in addressing concerns such as range anxiety and could potentially hasten consumer adoption of electric vehicles.


The integration of NACS by various manufacturers, along with its simultaneous existence with the CCS standard, indicates a significant transformation in the EV charging landscape. Despite the challenges in ensuring interoperability between different standards, the overarching advantage is the increased availability and user-friendliness of EV charging infrastructure. This evolution is instrumental in creating a more inclusive and accessible electric vehicle ecosystem.

This article was co-written using AI and was then heavily edited and optimized by our editorial team

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Join the conversation
  • Scott What people want is the Jetson Car sound.This has come up before.
  • Joerg I just bought a Corolla Cross Hybrid SE a few weeks ago, and I regret it. But not for any of the reasons stated so far. It drives well enough for me, gas mileage is great for a car like that, the interior is fine, nothing to complain about for normal daily use. I bought this relatively small SUV thinking it is basically just a smaller version of the RAV4 (the RAV4 felt too big for me, drives like a tank, so I never really considered it). I also considered the AWD Prius, but storage capacity is just too small (my dog would not fit in the small and low cargo space).But there are a few things that I consider critical for me, and that I thought would be a given for any SUV (and therefore did not do my due diligence before the purchase): It can’t use snow chains per the manual, nor any other snow traction devices. Even with AWD, snow chains are sometimes required where I go, or just needed to get out of a stuck situation.The roof rack capacity is only a miniscule 75 lbs, so I can’t really load my roof top box with stuff for bigger trips.Ironically, the European version allows snow chains and roof rack capacity is 165 lbs. Same for the US Prius version. What was Toyota thinking?Lastly, I don’t like that there is no spare tire, but I knew that before the purchase. But it is ridiculous that this space is just filled up with a block of foam. At least it should be made available for additional storage. In hindsight, I should have bought a RAV4. The basic LE Hybrid version would have been just about 1k more.
  • MaintenanceCosts Looks like the best combination of capability, interior comfort, and subtle appearance can be achieved by taking a Laramie (crew cab, short bed, 4x4 of course) and equipping it with the Sport Appearance, Towing Technology, and Level 2 packages as well as a few standalone options. That's my pick.Rebel is too CRUSH THAT CAN BRO and Limited and up are too cowboy Cadillac.
  • Xidex easier to buy a mustang that already sounds like that. love the coyote growl
  • Oberkanone Shaker motor on an EV. No thanks.