Mazda On The Prowl For A New Beau

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

There is a new Japanese bride on the Match.com equivalent of the international auto business. It’s Mazda. Despite pronouncements that Mazda’s “strategic alliance with Ford will remain unshaken” (as uttered at a Monday press conference by Mazda Executive VP Masaharu Yamaki,) everybody who knows the business knows: The bloom is off the rose between Mazda and Ford. What’s more, Mazda is on the prowl to do some nampa with another potent partner. Who will it be?

Currently, all eyes are on Toyota. Last week, we reported that Toyota will sell Mazda the innards necessary to build a Prius-like Mazda hybrid. But Mazda doesn’t want an erector kit; they want to build the stuff themselves. So on Monday, Mazda announced it will get Toyota’s hybrid technologies under a license agreement. Says The Nikkei [sub]: “The deal, which allows Mazda to launch its own hybrid model as early as 2013, is the carmaker’s strategic response to its weakening ties with Ford Motor Co., which has reduced its stake in the Japanese company to about 11 percent from more than one-third.”

The former technological cooperation already has degraded down to mere “exchanges of information.” The information that is exchanged has no value. If an executive from Ford wants to attend a meeting at Mazda, the matters discussed must be carefully vetted beforehand and signed-off in advance. An outside vendor has better access to Mazda internals than Ford.

With both partners living in separation and under no-contact orders, “Mazda is now open to the idea of partnering with other automakers as a way to survive in the rapidly changing competitive landscape in the industry,” says the Nikkei.

The hybrid deal doesn’t mean the Mazda wants to marry Toyota. Mazda simply doesn’t want to spend a lot of money to develop hybrid models as long as hybrids only command a tiny market share, said a top Mazda executive. What’s more, Toyota has locked-up so many patents around hybrids technology that it’s cheaper to pay now than to develop and get in trouble later.

And if hybrids take off, Mazda wants to one-up Toyota. Let’s face it, a hybrid still needs an ICU. And Mazda thinks they have an ace in the hole with a new-generation engine called SKY, which will be installed in the maker’s mainstay models from 2011. That engine already has a 15-20 percent better fuel efficiency than Mazda’s current mills. Mazda is working on a gasoline compact car that gets better mileage than Honda’s Insight.

Once that SKY-engine is paired with the licensed Toyota technologies, Mazda hopes to offer the most fuel-efficient vehicle on the market. Suddenly, that bride looks very attractive, especially to European car makers, where Japanese brides are held in high regard. Excellent choice, I might add.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Uncle Mellow Uncle Mellow on Mar 30, 2010

    I always thought the Ford/Mazda alliance had more benefits for Ford than for Mazda. As a longtime Mazda owner , I am pleased future Mazdas will be less tainted with Ford influence.

  • Dimwit Dimwit on Mar 30, 2010

    I'm shocked that Ford would be so braindead to let Mazda get away. I can't believe that the relationship is so damaged that Mazzda can't work something in their favour.

  • Akear Does anyone care how the world's sixth largest carmaker conducts business. Just a quarter century ago GM was the world's top carmaker. [list=1][*]Toyota Group: Sold 10.8 million vehicles, with a growth rate of 4.6%.[/*][*]Volkswagen Group: Achieved 8.8 million sales, growing sharply in America (+16.6%) and Europe (+20.3%).[/*][*]Hyundai-Kia: Reported 7.1 million sales, with surges in America (+7.9%) and Asia (+6.3%).[/*][*]Renault Nissan Alliance: Accumulated 6.9 million sales, balancing struggles in Asia and Africa with growth in the Americas and Europe.[/*][*]Stellantis: Maintained the fifth position with 6.5 million sales, despite substantial losses in Asia.[/*][*]General Motors,&nbsp;Honda Motor, and&nbsp;Ford&nbsp;followed closely with 6.2 million, 4.1 million, and 3.9 million sales, respectively.[/*][/list=1]
  • THX1136 A Mr. J. Sangburg, professional manicurist, rust repairer and 3 times survivor is hoping to get in on the bottom level of this magnificent property. He has designs to open a tea shop and used auto parts store in the facility as soon as there is affordable space available. He has stated, for the record, "You ain't seen anything yet and you probably won't." Always one for understatement, Mr. Sangburg hasn't been forthcoming with any more information at this time. You can follow the any further developments @GotItFiguredOut.net.
  • TheEndlessEnigma And yet government continues to grow....
  • TheEndlessEnigma Not only do I not care about the move, I do not care about GM....gm...or whatever it calls itself.
  • Redapple2 As stated above, gm now is not the GM of old. They say it themselves without realizing it. New logo: GM > gm. As much as I dislike my benefactor (gm spent ~ $200,000 on my BS and MS) I try to be fair, a smart business makes timely decisions based on the reality of the current (and future estimates) situation. The move is a good one.
Next