GMAC Returns to Sub-Prime Lending

by Robert Farago

Published: April 1st, 2009

I know, huh? And there I was thinking that easy credit and bad loans were a main contributory factor to our current economic doldrums (aren’t euphemisms grand?). But after the Fed changed its rules at the eleventh hour (behind closed doors) so that GMAC could avoid bankruptcy and become (of all things) a bank, after Uncle Sam pumped $6B worth of taxpayers’ money into the privately-held company’s coffers ($1B of which went straight to GM), the failed “bank” has reversed its reversal of its lax lending practices and opened the taps. “We want to do our part to support both the U.S. auto industry and individuals in the market for a car or truck,” said GMAC President Bill Muir, in a prepared statement. “GMAC now finances a broad spectrum of auto buyers, similar to traditional levels.”

Traditional? Is that what they call the “anyone with a pulse” financing that GMAC generated to keep GM (and then Chrysler) in Denialand? And now, with a gentle nod to accountability-free post-modern irony, GMAC will once again loan money to car buyers with FICO credit scores below 620. It will also increase allowable advance rates (120 percent loans are back and they’re bad!). And, just for S&Gs, they’ll reduce some financing rates.

“Over the next 60 days, GMAC will make available at least $5 billion in order to increase the flow of credit to U.S. automotive customers, Muir said.

60 days. Huh. Isn’t that the exact amount of time President Obama’s Task Force gave GM to get its shit together?

Equally uh, “interesting” (especially for conspiracy theorists who connect the dots between GMAC, Cerberus and former U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow), GMAC is suddenly getting out of the business of putting GM and Chrysler dealers out of business.

During April, GMAC will eliminate “curtailment payments” designed to collect on dealer loans on unsold inventory. Through June, GMAC will waive the fee charged to dealers for posting unsold vehicles on SmartAuction (GMAC’s online marketing site). What’s more, qualified dealers (?) can defer wholesale interest charges for two 30-day periods during the next 120 days.

Tin foil hat at the ready, methinks someone is doing their level best to tilt the level playing field in GM’s direction. To what end I have no idea.

Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 10 comments

A is A on Apr 02, 2009
Selling working people a car without a 700 credit score is what made the business flourish! Yes. In the same sense that Cocaine makes your well being "flourish". For a while. Later it cames the depression and the paranoia. GMAC is ready to roll up the dollar bill again, just after finishing rehab.

Like Reply
DweezilSFV on Apr 02, 2009

A is A: No,what oldyak is saying is that the average car buyer doesn't always have a 790 or 800 point credit score.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?