GM in Talks to Take Back Parts of Delphi

John Horner
by John Horner

The General Motors spin-off of Delphi which never really was, isn’t. Today’s Wall Street Journal [sub] has another “people involved in the negotiations”-sourced story claiming that these latest moves are all “part of a strategy to qualify for additional government loans”. Delphi has never really been an independent company from the start. The obvious reason of course is that GM provides the vast majority of Delphi’s business. But more than that, GM is on the hook for Delphi’s pension costs, has paid the price for voluntary separations at Delphi and has repeatedly been the source of bailout bucks for Delphi. Considering that “since 2005, GM has poured in $11.7 billion to help sustain the company,” they might as well just call it the Delphi Division. But how do federal bailout dollars get wrapped up in this mess?

“As a separate company from GM, Delphi isn’t eligible for the government’s auto-bailout aid at this point. In assuming control of some of Delphi’s operations—representing up to 20% of Delphi’s total sales—GM would be taking a calculated bet it can creatively pry more support from the government. As long as GM owes the government money, all its transactions over $100 million are subject to approval by the Treasury Department, which oversees loans to the auto makers. As it reviews a proposal for GM to absorb part of Delphi, the Treasury could borrow from the approach Washington took on the financial-sector meltdown last fall, seeing value in the consolidation of otherwise-failed businesses.” Yeah Sparky, we see how well the Wells Fargo-Merrill Lynch thing has been going, so lets do the same with GM-Delphi!

Delphi has been stuck in bankruptcy court for three years now and can’t get out because nobody wants to lend it any money. This latest Hail Mary pass is built on the belief that lenders would be more likely to give Delphi money if it did less business with GM, and that the government will give GM even money if it clearly owns even more money-losing factories. The madness of it all boggles the mind. Good luck sorting this out Mr. Car Czar, whoever you are! Meanwhile, the executive bonuses and Wall Street advising fees paid out celebrating the birth of Delphi remain in the hands of the masters of the universe who cooked the books to make it happen.

John Horner
John Horner

More by John Horner

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Snafu Snafu on Feb 10, 2009
    BM, "after roughly $400,000,000 in legal fees we end up with further proof that Wagoner truly deserves to be called Red Ink Rick. boggles the mind how this incompetent man remains…" Funny huh how the mess GM is in has striking similarities to Delphi’s quagmire. Battenberg and Dawes, former Delphi, came from the same GM mold as RIR, Red Ink Rick and perpetrated some of the same money mumbo jumbo as did GM and ended up in C11, the difference is, the SEC let GM off the so called hook. WTF is wrong with this country and the people/companies we rely upon to maintain corporate integrity . . . including our government! Are these economic principals part of the educational curriculum that is gained while earning a degree? Yea I know, I’m being sarcastic but the fact remains, those individuals need to be held accountable and there are a lot of them!
  • Ihatetrees Ihatetrees on Feb 10, 2009
    snafu: WTF is wrong with this country and the people/companies we rely upon to maintain corporate integrity . . . including our government! Bring back the hostile takeover. Allow a couple of billionaires to buy GM, take it to bankruptcy, gut it. Long term (over 3+ years), the Chevy and Caddy brands gotta be worth a few billion - even if all the product you're selling is made in Korea.
  • Redapple2 As stated above, gm now is not the GM of old. They say it themselves without realizing it. New logo: GM > gm. As much as I dislike my benefactor (gm spent ~ $200,000 on my BS and MS) I try to be fair, a smart business makes timely decisions based on the reality of the current (and future estimates) situation. The move is a good one.
  • Dave M. After an 19-month wait, I finally got my Lariat hybrid in January. It's everything I expected and more for my $35k. The interior is more than adequate for my needs, and I greatly enjoy all the safety features present, which I didn't have on my "old" car (2013 Outback). It's solidly built, and I'm averaging 45-50 mpgs on my 30 mile daily commute (35-75 mph); I took my first road trip last weekend and averaged 35 mpgs at 75-80 mph. Wishes? Memory seats, ventilated seats, and Homelink. Overall I'm very pleased and impressed. It's my first American branded car in my 45 years of buying new cars. Usually I'm a J-VIN kind of guy....
  • Shipwright off topic.I wonder if the truck in the picture has a skid plate to protect the battery because, judging by the scuff mark in the rock immediately behind the truck, it may dented.
  • EBFlex This doesn’t bode well for the real Mustang. When you start slapping meaningless sticker packages it usually means it’s not going to be around long.
  • Rochester I recently test drove the Maverick and can confirm your pros & cons list. Spot on.
Next