Thread: Sales Of Convertibles Are Decelerating; Blame The (Fuel) Economy Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Forum - The Truth About Cars forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
08-28-2015 10:41 AM
seth1065 well all the above are true having a vert is great If you have a shelter for it and lets face it they cost more cash and what really killed them was AC in cars, most of the folks I know who have verts today have them as extra cars, I have had a ragtops cars for over 20 years but they have always been a extra car for summer use, I assume a large amount of Miata's are the spare car in the house. They are great to own that way but you need the space, and extra cash to do it.
08-22-2015 07:31 PM
Chi-One
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpolicke View Post
I think you've both got the reasons wrong. The convertible option may add some weight, but probably not enough to lose more than a couple tenths of an MPG. As for the aero, I don't think there is a requirement to run mileage numbers for the feds in both top-up and top-down conditions. If it doesn't need to be tested, then for all intents it doesn't exist. The much bigger downside for the manufacturer is the complexity that comes with the option. Consider all the bracing & reinforcement required to replace the rigidity that is required to make a unibody car stiff enough to pass modern crash tests. It's hard to justify the engineering to make provision for all the changes in a low volume convertible variant. You might sell enough -vert Mustangs and Camaros to cover the cost; it's highly unlikely on other model lines. The styling of most cars doesn't even allow for a -vert since most don't offer a 2-door version to make it out of. Turn a Fusion, Malibu, Camry, Sonata into a convertible? Not gonna happen. It would be equivalent to designing a model twice.

As for the consumer, NO ONE is buying a pickup or SUV because of their fuel economy advantages over a convertible. More likely they look at a soft top and see social miscreants cutting it open to either gain access to the interior or simply for the joy of vandalism. They see the expense of maintaining seals, linkages, lift pistons, and the eventual replacement of the top. They don't have a garage to shelter it in and they don't fancy trying to safely get the snow off the top in winter. And, since they don't live in California the number of ideal top-down days of driving, when it's not too cold, rainy, blazing hot, or dripping humid to enjoy open motoring, is too few to justify the expense.
Agree on the number of top-down days, (esp here in Chicago), just traded in 2014 DUSK SE conv on a Challenger.
08-22-2015 11:19 AM
jpolicke I think you've both got the reasons wrong. The convertible option may add some weight, but probably not enough to lose more than a couple tenths of an MPG. As for the aero, I don't think there is a requirement to run mileage numbers for the feds in both top-up and top-down conditions. If it doesn't need to be tested, then for all intents it doesn't exist. The much bigger downside for the manufacturer is the complexity that comes with the option. Consider all the bracing & reinforcement required to replace the rigidity that is required to make a unibody car stiff enough to pass modern crash tests. It's hard to justify the engineering to make provision for all the changes in a low volume convertible variant. You might sell enough -vert Mustangs and Camaros to cover the cost; it's highly unlikely on other model lines. The styling of most cars doesn't even allow for a -vert since most don't offer a 2-door version to make it out of. Turn a Fusion, Malibu, Camry, Sonata into a convertible? Not gonna happen. It would be equivalent to designing a model twice.

As for the consumer, NO ONE is buying a pickup or SUV because of their fuel economy advantages over a convertible. More likely they look at a soft top and see social miscreants cutting it open to either gain access to the interior or simply for the joy of vandalism. They see the expense of maintaining seals, linkages, lift pistons, and the eventual replacement of the top. They don't have a garage to shelter it in and they don't fancy trying to safely get the snow off the top in winter. And, since they don't live in California the number of ideal top-down days of driving, when it's not too cold, rainy, blazing hot, or dripping humid to enjoy open motoring, is too few to justify the expense.
08-21-2015 06:16 AM
dolorean
Sales Of Convertibles Are Decelerating; Blame The (Fuel) Economy

NPR has a small story (and a gorgeous photo of a suicide sloop Lincoln Conty) on the decline of the convertible linking it to the loss of fuel economy of the model due to added weight and change of aerodynamics. While this postulate is interesting, I would think it's more due to the Pickup and CUV being the way to show you've made it or you're a MAN, over the drop-top. But there could be other reasons I'm not thinking of.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2022 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.