Ford, Mazda, Changan Want A Divorce, Remarry Separately

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Threesomes can get burdensome to keep together. Didn’t we report in January that Ford, Mazda, and China’s Changan want to end the ménage-a-la-trois and forge their individual joint ventures? It was quickly dismissed as “speculation.” Just because it’s a speculation doesn’t mean that it won’t come true.

Ford, Mazda, and Changan have asked the Chinese government to dissolve their three-way tie up, Reuters says.

As reported months ago, Ford and Mazda plan to engage in separate joint ventures with Changan. Both are looking for the usual 50:50 deal.

“They have submitted a joint proposal to the Chinese government to split up the partnership. Ford’s new JV with Changan will be based in Chongqing, while Mazda’s venture will be based in Nanjing,” said an unnamed source to Reuters.

Also, the denials stopped. Ford and Changan gave a “no comment.” Mazda said to Reuters they are “awaiting regulatory approval for a restructuring move,” but they wouldn’t go into details. Gasgoo even reports that “Mazda told the media that it is true that Mazda and Ford will separate the joint-venture in China.”

Ever since Ford reduced its controlling 33 percent stake in Mazda to 11 percent in 2008 to raise cash, the couple has become increasingly estranged. If an executive from Ford wants to attend a meeting at Mazda, the matters discussed must be carefully vetted beforehand and signed-off in advance. Mazda is rumored to look for another beau, but none has surfaced so far.

Splitsville in the world’s largest auto market is “a good move as a three-way tie could get complicated sometimes. The biggest beneficiary, however, would be Mazda as it could be an equal partner in the new tie,” said Chen Liang, an analyst with Huatai Securities.

The Wall Street Journal has its own version of the three-way divorce. They found “a person close to the situation” who said that “he suspects Changan may be marginally interested in having the application approved. Changan may well prefer the status quo of having its two foreign partners as weak minority stakeholders of the joint venture.”

Understandable. But imagine being in bed with two beauties who scratch each other’s eyes out. Let me tell you: No fun at all.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 4 comments
  • Buickman Buickman on May 13, 2010

    let's keep it a bit less provocative.

    • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on May 13, 2010

      OK then how bout this. Ford should have treated Mazda better during the time they've been working together cause Ford has gotten some great things from Mazda. The only reason the last generation of Escorts were worth a smack upside the head is that under the skin the cars were almost totally Mazda in their engineering. Ford and Mazda benefited more from their partnership than ANY partner GM has ever had.

  • Accs Accs on May 29, 2010

    Some things.. I just dont know. Ford has its 11%.. and I guess Mazda does decent in the U.S. They are a bit like the "Sporty" brand for Ford.. WITHOUT the HORRIBLE stigma of being a Ford. -- Linc / Merc. -- One reason why I'm stumbling over reasons to buy the new Focus HATCH v the Mazda3 hatch. What is stopping Ford from selling Mazda as Ford in China? Other auto companies have rebadged other vehicles in other markets.. as a placeholder. I could see how it could be difficult for a 3some.. so what "consolidation" is possible FOR that market.

  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek&nbsp;recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue.&nbsp;"Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
  • MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
Next