Daewoo-wo-wo-wo: White Flags Over Korea?

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

All kinds of strange news are coming from GM’s Korean foster child Daewoo. Two days ago, Daewoo CEO Mike Arcamone announced: “In 2010, GM Daewoo will be profitable. That is my target.” That didn’t get much traction. Reporters wanted to know how bad last year’s numbers were. Arcamone remained tight-lipped. He admitted red ink for 2009, how much remains anybody’s guess. In 2008, it was $773m worth of red. Last October Daewoo-is-me had to be bailed out by the bailed-out GM to the tune of $413m. Arcamone has some soothing news: “We currently do not seek any other financial support from our creditors.” The operative word is “currently.” There is one way to stop the hemorrhage for good: Pack it in.

Arcamone bravely announced that he would fight to the last bullet, employ “aggressive” sales tactics, improve sales networks, reduce structural costs, launch three new models and manage working capital more efficiently. In other words, the usual measures when you are at your wits end. He did not mention that Daewoo would ditch their dealer network and their name. That was left for later.

Today, Korea’s Chosun Iibo has new dispatches from the crumbling front: “Daewoo has announced a breakup with Daewoo Motor Sales Corp., which used to be its sole network of dealerships. The automaker will choose other dealers.” Their source is none else than Mike Arcamone.

Founded in 1993 by spinning off the sales unit of Daewoo, Daewoo Motor Sales took exclusive charge of selling GM Daewoo cars in the domestic market since 2002, when GM acquired the Korean carmaker. In January, GM Daewoo introduced a system whereby separate dealers are designated in each of the eight regions, and Daewoo Motor Sales’ right in four regions were withdrawn. Note to Arcamone: When your market share goes down, exchanging your whole dealer network is rarely a good idea. Daewoo’s share in Korea was down to 7.9 percent last year from 9.6 percent in 2008. Hyundai and Kia Motors together monopolize more than 70 percent of the Korean market.

The Chosun Iibo thinks dumping Daewoo Motor Sales is a whitewashing maneuver: “There is criticism that GM simply tries to shift the burden from local sales to dealerships so as to minimize its liabilities when it exits the Korean market.” Say what? They bail?

Now, for the next Daewoo-wo-wo news: “General Motors is considering replacing the Daewoo brand with the Chevrolet name in South Korea,” says Financial Times today. Who’s the source of that harebrained rumor? Mikey did it again. Not quite a done deal yet. Arcamone is thinking about it.

According to the FT, “Mike Arcamone, GM Daewoo’s president, yesterday said the company would reveal its decision on the rebranding by the middle of May.”

“This is a huge decision that will have a major impact on our future business and success in Korea,” Mr Arcamone said yesterday. You better believe it.

Before, GM had not used the US brand in South Korea. They thought such a move could alienate the last few customers they have. “Such a move would also face resistance from labor unions,” says the FT. So why now? Preparation for an orderly retreat from the Korean peninsula?

The Chosun Iibo had choice words for that idea: “The introduction of the Chevrolet brand could cause GM Daewoo to lose the two most essential factors for survival — the capacity to develop new models and its own brand identity.”

Let’s see how red Daewoo’s 2009 was. Then, we’ll start the Daewoo Death Watch.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Niky Niky on Mar 12, 2010

    Here I read the first part of your reply and actually thought that was a serious question. ;) Just like some people mistakenly believed that GMDAT was actually a serious venture and not another attempt by GM to make a quick buck with cheap engineering and big volume.

  • Don1967 Don1967 on Mar 12, 2010

    So GM takes on the CUV craze with Aztec, the global warming craze with a coal-burner, and the Korean craze with Daewoo. It's almost like there's a pattern here.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
Next