Chrysler Requests $753 Million For Incentives-Based Dealer Culling

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

After crying that bankrupt automakers can’t sell cars (as in, “there but for the grace of the taxpayers go we”), Chrysler is requesting $753 million to do what it said was impossible. And who minds profit-draining record incentives when taxpayers are picking up the tab? Automotive News [sub] breaks down Chrysler’s request for $4.6 billion of DIP financing, and reveals that incentives are no longer just about moving metal.

According to bankruptcy filings, Chrysler will “only pay incentives to those dealers that they believe have value to the acquiring company.” You know, the “ indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Fiat S.p.A.” In other words, 25 percent of all good, honest, all-American Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep dealerships and the communities they support can go suck it. By AN‘s math, that makes 800 dealerships that have a new biggest problem: how to sell a Sebring without incentives. Sorry guys, but the New, New Carissa, er, Chrysler has sailed without you. You were “Bad Chrysler.” Goodbye.

Meanwhile, if you are considering an automobile purchase and just don’t trust the firms that aren’t failing, Chrysler is making it easy on you. The Pentastar will blow $477 million on incentives for the first four weeks of its bankruptcy, peaking at $147 million for the week of May 25 alone. That’s the week to buy a Chrysler, you crazy person.

For the taxpayers out there (feel the pride!) we have a little more info on how (besides putting cash on hoods) your money will be spent during Chrysler’s bankruptcy. $1.49 billion will go to suppliers for about 45 days worth of already delivered parts. For many suppliers this will be the kiss goodbye since production is at a standstill. $69 million will be spent on marketing. That’s about half of Chrysler’s usual expenditure over the same period, and promises to produce some entertaining copy. $266 million will be spent on warranty claims. Most of these numbers were “arrived at in consultation with the Treasury,” according to ChryCo spokesfolks.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Rpol35 Rpol35 on May 05, 2009

    I use to have a poster just like this picture of the foundering ship in my office. Underneath the picture was a caption that read,"Could this mean that the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others?" More appropriate now, in Chrysler's case, than I ever realized.....

  • 50merc 50merc on May 05, 2009

    Do I have this right: the government is putting money into Chrysler to save a private business, and the government is also putting money into Chrysler so it can do away with many private businesses? I wonder if it has occurred to GM that it can cull its dealership ranks by raising car prices $5,000 and simultaneously putting $5,000 rebates on the hoods of cars sold by favored stores.

  • Dave M. My sweet spot is $40k (loaded) with 450 mile range.
  • Master Baiter Mass adoption of EVs will require:[list=1][*]400 miles of legitimate range at 80 MPH at 100°F with the AC on, or at -10°F with the cabin heated to 72°F. [/*][*]Wide availability of 500+ kW fast chargers that are working and available even on busy holidays, along interstates where people drive on road trips. [/*][*]Wide availability of level 2 chargers at apartments and on-street in urban settings where people park on the street. [/*][*]Comparable purchase price to ICE vehicle. [/*][/list=1]
  • Master Baiter Another bro-dozer soon to be terrorizing suburban streets near you...
  • Wolfwagen NO. Im not looking to own an EV until:1. Charge times from 25% - 100% are equal to what it takes to fill up an ICE vehicle and 2. until the USA proves we have enough power supply so as not to risk the entire grid going down when millions of people come home from work and plug their vehicles in the middle of a heat wave with feel-like temps over 100.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Where's the mpg?
Next