China In July 2010: The Ice Age Now

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Ooops. Time to send our patent-pending TTAC China sales oracle on vacation. Send the China Automotive Technology & Research Center (and Bloomberg) right with them. The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) has given the official word on Chinese car sales in July 2010. And they are down. Way down.

China’s car sales in July crawled along at a snail’s pace not seen since the bad old days in March 2009. Sales of passenger-cars rose 13.6 percent from a year earlier to 946,200 units in July, according to a statement which the CAAM emailed to China Daily. Total Vehicle sales in July gained 14.4 percent to 1.24 million units.

Of course, that’s not down. Growth is growth. Especially as compared with the crazy days of July 2009, when sales in China went ballistic by 70 percent. As we said last week: Any growth that betters these numbers is amazing. But this is China, and China gets the shakes when growth numbers aren’t at least borderline insane.

Against this backdrop, GM China’s July results (up 22.2 percent to 176,645 vehicles) are simply amazing. This also confused our sales oracle, which was given a Valium and sent to Bangkok for some R&R. It needs it. The actual, real number is lower than what the usually pessimistic China Automotive Technology & Research Center (CARC) had predicted. They had passenger vehicles at 15.4 percent , and all vehicles at 17 percent plus in July. Wrong.

The real number will cause some serious head-scratching. Shameless Bloomberg has conveniently forgotten its boo-boo and crows that “Even as growth slows, inventory of unsold vehicles is building as inflation erodes disposable incomes in the world’s biggest auto market and reduces consumers’ appetite for new cars.” Bloomberg says that “Sales may begin shrinking as early as September, according to the Daiwa Institute of Research.” Duh, Einsteins. Sales could shrink as early as August. It compares with an August 2009 when sales had doubled.

What is true is that the Chinese market is cooling off a bit. July was a bit strange. As reported a few days ago, China’s government introduced subsidies for fuel-efficient models in July, and as a result, sales of fuel-efficient compact cars dropped. “Many people appear reluctant to buy now in the hope that even bigger discounts will be introduced in the future,” wrote The Nikkei [sub]. When dealers raise prices, there probably will be a run on the dealerships. Only in China.

Said Sheng Ye, associate research director at industry consultancy Ipsos: “Auto sales have always been slow in the summer. But an extraordinary strong 2009 and worries of about the economy are also to blame. We might see more traffic at showrooms by autumn, but it won’t be anything close to the packed showrooms and explosive sales we saw in 2009.”

And guess what’s really driving them nuts? Sales at perennial rival India are at an all time high. Car sales in India jumped 38 percent to a record 158,764 units in July, compared with a 30.8 percent gain in June, says Reuters.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • I_godzuki I_godzuki on Aug 09, 2010

    Not sure what your beef is with Bloomberg. The two numbers may be both right or at least not as wrong as you suggest. The CAAM numbers are wholesale numbers whereas the CARC numbers claim to be retail sales. Given stocks of cars are rising, it's reasonable that dealers are adding incentives to shift metal, thus boosting sales slightly more (growth of 15.4%), while the wholesale figures are growing slightly lower (at 13.6%)as the makers try to reduce those inventories by slowing supply. Anyway, even if that isn't the case, a 2% different between the two surveys is probably a reasonable level of error given the one you don't like comes out much earlier and is presumably based on some kind of sampling.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next