Volkswagen ID4 Again Recalled Due to Defective Door Handles

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Tuesday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said that Volkswagen would need to recall 98,806 all-electric crossovers over an issue with the doors. The matter is effectively an expansion of a 2023 recall impacting the 2021-2022 VW ID.4. The recall now encompasses vehicles from the 2023 and 2024 model year.


As with the earlier recall, the problem pertains to a design flaw that allows water to seep into the circuit board assemblies housed within the door handles. Apparently this can cause the vehicle to unseal the doors, allowing them to be flung open when there’s enough force placed upon them. This can be done by an unwitting passenger leaning on them or even a modest amount of lateral g-force produced when turning.


Electronic door handles always seemed incredibly silly, as they added needless levels of complexity to what should be one of the simplest components of a vehicle. While a slick gimmick, inclusions like this are just going to pad the final price of a vehicle and be something you’ll need to have replaced. We’ve also seen electronically controlled doors creating problems for reviewers when a vehicle malfunctions — creating an unnecessary safety issue.


Let’s just say that Volkswagen isn’t the only automaker building EVs that had to be recalled because the electronic door handles were acting up.


Obviously people don’t want to be locked inside of a vehicle against their will, nor do they want said door swinging open in the middle of their journey. As recalls goes this one is fairly embarrassing, especially since the manufacturer was being tipped off about the problem as early as 2022. Volkswagen had received reports of two incidents in the United States that year and launched an internal investigation. Additional complaints came in over successive months and a recall notice was issued by the NHTSA in May of 2023.


The affected cars came from the Zwickau plant in Germany, meaning that VW may not have properly address the issue or that models that went into production inside the United States are suffering from the same problem. However, vehicles built in Chattanooga, Tennessee, were said not to be impacted by the earlier recall.


Dealers will inspect and replace the door handle and update the vehicle software for free as part of the recall. Owners are expected to be notified by November.

[Images: Volkswagen Group]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 18 comments
  • Tassos Tassos on Sep 12, 2024

    DEFECTIVE DOOR HANDLES WERE ONE OF THE ARGUMENTS MY LAWYER USED IN MY WARSAW VIP KIDNAPPING CASE. IT HELPED GET THE SENTENCE DOWN TO PROBATION AND NO CONTACT WITH VIP NIGHT BOYS

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Sep 14, 2024

    Subaru encourages customers to get outside and explore the outdoors. VW helps customers get outside the vehicle, on turns.

    • See 2 previous
    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Sep 14, 2024

      No I am not tired of replying to myself. Or I wasn't. I am now.



  • KOKing I owned a Paul Bracq-penned BMW E24 some time ago, and I recently started considering getting Sacco's contemporary, the W124 coupe.
  • Bob The answer is partially that stupid manufacturers stopped producing desirable PHEVs.I bought my older kid a beautiful 2011 Volt, #584 off the assembly line and #000007 for HOV exemption in MD. We love the car. It was clearly an old guy's car, and his kids took away his license.It's a perfect car for a high school kid, really. 35 miles battery range gets her to high school, job, practice, and all her friend's houses with a trickle charge from the 120V outlet. In one year (~7k miles), I have put about 10 gallons of gas in her car, and most of that was for the required VA emissions check minimum engine runtime.But -- most importantly -- that gas tank will let her make the 300-mile trip to college in one shot so that when she is allowed to bring her car on campus, she will actually get there!I'm so impressed with the drivetrain that I have active price alerts for the Cadillac CT6 2.0e PHEV on about 12 different marketplaces to replace my BMW. Would I actually trade in my 3GT for a CT6? Well, it depends on what broke in German that week....
  • ToolGuy Different vehicle of mine: A truck. 'Example' driving pattern: 3/3/4 miles. 9/12/12/9 miles. 1/1/3/3 miles. 5/5 miles. Call that a 'typical' week. Would I ever replace the ICE powertrain in that truck? No, not now. Would I ever convert that truck to EV? Yes, very possibly. Would I ever convert it to a hybrid or PHEV? No, that would be goofy and pointless. 🙂
  • ChristianWimmer Took my ‘89 500SL R129 out for a spin in his honor (not a recent photo).Other great Mercedes’ designers were Friedrich Geiger, who styled the 1930s 500K/540K Roadsters and my favorite S-Class - the W116 - among others. Paul Bracq is also a legend.RIP, Bruno.
  • ToolGuy Currently my drives tend to be either extra short or fairly long. (We'll pick that vehicle over there and figure in the last month, 5 miles round trip 3 times a week, plus 1,000 miles round trip once.) The short trips are torture for the internal combustion powertrain, the long trips are (relative) torture for my wallet. There is no possible way that the math works to justify an 'upgrade' to a more efficient ICE, or an EV, or a hybrid, or a PHEV. Plus my long trips tend to include (very) out of the way places. One day the math will work and the range will work and the infrastructure will work (if the range works) and it will work in favor of a straight EV (purchased used). At that point the short trips won't be torture for the EV components and the long trips shouldn't hurt my wallet. What we will have at that point is the steady drip-drip-drip of long-term battery degradation. (I always pictured myself buying generic modular replacement cells at Harbor Freight or its future equivalent, but who knows if that will be possible). The other option that would almost possibly work math-wise would be to lease a new EV at some future point (but the payment would need to be really right). TL;DR: ICE now, EV later, Hybrid maybe, PHEV probably never.
Next