Tesla Drops Prices, Potentially Ramps Fleet Sales to Rentals

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

There’s never any shortage of topics to discuss about Tesla – whether it’s nattering about Musk’s behavior, the company stock price, or its hands-off driving aids allegedly causing a pile-up on a busy motorway. 


This morning, a pundit tweeted they saw beaucoup de Tesla sitting idle at a Hertz location, suggesting the company may be stuffing rental channels in a bid to inflate sales. In quick succession, it then became clear that Tesla has slashed prices on all its models – big time.


First, the rental situation. According to Twitter user @PolitiReality, a host of (several hundred, by their estimation) Tesla Model 3 and Model Y vehicles were seen at a Hertz outlet in Boston, lined up side-by-each in a covered parking facility. They all appear to be plated and, judging by the signage, are definitely at an airport. The photographer went on to say they spoke with an attendant who suggested they were being “given to everyone” but that “50 percent of them” were being returned by renters. We’ll take those numbers with hefty grains of salt but there’s no denying the rows of idle Tesla cars.


Building on that story, the company has also apparently gone on a major price-slashing spree for all its models. In fact, prices for certain trims of the Model Y seem to have dropped by over 20 percent, with others like the rear-wheel drive Model 3 now stickered at $43,990. Spendy examples like the six-figure Model X have also had roughly 10 percent hacked from their prices, and a zoomy Model S Plaid can now be purchased for $114,900 compared to its previous sticker of $135,900.


Speculation is rampant this pricing change has much to do with the newfangled EV credit system, a rebate structure with byzantine sets of tiers, and a whole lotta math. The upshot is that Tesla could be restructuring their prices around these credits in a bid to move more metal. The same objective could also be accomplished by flooding the rental market with cars.


The irony should not be lost on anyone. After years of needling legacy automakers for this type of sales puffery, it seems Tesla is now feeding from the very same trough. Of course, this goes completely unnoticed by wittering Musk apologists, one of which actually tweeted “Doesn’t matter what you call it, its [sic] cars tesla [sic] sold. I call it $ in the bank! Whether Hertz is successful is not on Tesla.”


That noise you are hearing is us smacking our collective foreheads in exasperation and disbelief.


What these rabidly blind fans fail to acknowledge is a truism every other gearhead, including all of you in the B&B, has figured out for years: Stuffing the rental channel and laying money on the hood is a sure-fire way to tank the value of a vehicle. Detroit automakers, GM in particular, used to be the leaders in this particular race to the bottom. Shedding that behavior has helped those companies immediately.


So no, fanbois, while it might be “$ in the bank” in the short term, gains of this type often come at the expense of resale value, potentially having an effect on how much customers are willing to pay for a new one down the road – and the cycle continues. The adults in the room understand this. We also understand that EV competition is much tougher than it was even just a couple of years ago; for wide swaths of customers, Tesla is no longer the default choice for an electric car.


TTAC once had a GM Deathwatch, y'know.


[Images: Tesla]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 63 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jan 17, 2023

    This today regarding Hertz rental Teslas:


    https://insideevs.com/news/631612/hertz-added-electric-cars-profits-boomed/


    "Hertz calculated that its EVs are between 50-60% cheaper to maintain than gasoline-powered cars. In addition, the cars don't need to be maintained or repaired as often, which means more time in service."

  • El scotto El scotto on Jan 17, 2023

    Higher income people seem to like EV's.


    The Venn diagrams of ignorance and low income have a huge overlap. Perhaps this overlap could be also be called EV-haters?


    Overall, the EV-haters lack of writing and research skills seems to reinforce this.


    Things to think about.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
Next