Not for You: Italy rescinds EU funds earmarked for Stellantis
Use it or lose it, right? The decision by Stellantis to pause on new construction of a so-called Gigafactory in Italy has resulted in that country’s government deciding to use funds previously earmarked for that endeavor elsewhere.
According to reports from across the pond, the Italian government is clawing back some 200 million euros (about $220 million USD) previously planned for a project that was going to be led by Stellantis. The development in question is a battery-making facility which was once planned for a region in eastern Italy, all under the banner of a joint venture called ACC in which Stellantis is a major partner. Mercedes and Total Energy are also shareholders.
In fact, ACC had designs for three of these facilities in Europe – one each in France and Germany plus the Italy plant mentioned in this post. Announcements were made earlier this year about the halting of works on the German and Italian shops amid a shift in EV demand plus stiff competition from other markets.
"We have of course to schedule the capacity increase in accordance with the cell's (demand) ramp up," Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares said on Tuesday in Italy. "As soon as EV sales increase in Europe, as soon as I see that I need more capacity, I will trigger the investment of the two additional plants in Germany and Italy," Tavares explained.
To be clear, it seems the EV market continues to grow in these and other regions – just not at the rapid-fire pace of the last couple of years. Anyone with half a grain of sense should have known the huge growth numbers were unsustainable; a doubling of market share, for example, is a lot easier at 2 percent than at 20 percent.
As for the 200 mil which has now vanished, it isn’t necessarily gone for good. Italian Industry Minister Adolfo Urso said that separate domestic state money could be earmarked if ACC is able to present a new industrial plan at a later stage. The original promise stemmed from the EU's post-COVID recovery pot for the support of investments consistent with Rome's energy strategy.
[Image: HJBC/Shutterstock.com]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.
More by Matthew Guy
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Clive Most 400 series highways in Canada were designed for 70 MPH using 70 year old cars. The modern cars brake, handle, ride better, and have much better tyres. If people would leave a 2-3 second gap and move to the right when cruising leaving the passing lanes open there would be much better traffic flow. The 401 was designed for a certain amount of traffic units; somewhere in the 300,000 range (1 car = 1 unit 1 semi+trailer =4 units) and was over the limit a few minutes after the 1964 official opening. What most places really need is better transit systems and better city designs to reduce the need for vehicle travel.
- Kira Interesting article but you guys obviously are in desperate need of an editor and I’d be happy to do the job. Keep in mind that automotive companies continually patent new technologies they’ve researched yet have no intention of developing at the time. Part of it is to defend against competitors, some is a “just in case” measure, and some is to pad resumes of the engineers.
- Jalop1991 Eh?
- EBFlex Wow Canada actually doing something decent for a change. What a concept.
- 3-On-The-Tree To Khory, I was a firefighter as well and the worst thing about car fires was the fumes from all the plastics and rubber, tires etc.
Comments
Join the conversation