Not for You: Italy rescinds EU funds earmarked for Stellantis

by Matthew Guy

Published: September 19th, 2024

Image: Shutterstock // HJBC

Use it or lose it, right? The decision by Stellantis to pause on new construction of a so-called Gigafactory in Italy has resulted in that country’s government deciding to use funds previously earmarked for that endeavor elsewhere.

According to reports from across the pond, the Italian government is clawing back some 200 million euros (about $220 million USD) previously planned for a project that was going to be led by Stellantis. The development in question is a battery-making facility which was once planned for a region in eastern Italy, all under the banner of a joint venture called ACC in which Stellantis is a major partner. Mercedes and Total Energy are also shareholders.

In fact, ACC had designs for three of these facilities in Europe – one each in France and Germany plus the Italy plant mentioned in this post. Announcements were made earlier this year about the halting of works on the German and Italian shops amid a shift in EV demand plus stiff competition from other markets.

"We have of course to schedule the capacity increase in accordance with the cell's (demand) ramp up," Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares said on Tuesday in Italy. "As soon as EV sales increase in Europe, as soon as I see that I need more capacity, I will trigger the investment of the two additional plants in Germany and Italy," Tavares explained.

To be clear, it seems the EV market continues to grow in these and other regions – just not at the rapid-fire pace of the last couple of years. Anyone with half a grain of sense should have known the huge growth numbers were unsustainable; a doubling of market share, for example, is a lot easier at 2 percent than at 20 percent.

As for the 200 mil which has now vanished, it isn’t necessarily gone for good. Italian Industry Minister Adolfo Urso said that separate domestic state money could be earmarked if ACC is able to present a new industrial plan at a later stage. The original promise stemmed from the EU's post-COVID recovery pot for the support of investments consistent with Rome's energy strategy.

[Image: HJBC/Shutterstock.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Stellantis #Italy #EV #BatteryPlants

Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 6 comments

DungBeetle62 on Sep 19, 2024
Appreciate the addition of "so-called" to "Gigafactory". It's a friggen manufacturing facility. Get over yourself, Elon. Look what you started.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Lorenzo on Sep 19, 2024
  No, thats a classification of factory size, by square footage. Small, Medium, Large, Mega, Giga, and Godzilla.
  
  Like
- Lou_BC on Sep 19, 2024
  "Small, Medium, Large, Mega, Giga, and Godzilla" Does that nomenclature apply to locker room bragging rights? ........ Quite the godzilla under that towel over there....
  
  1
SCE to AUX on Sep 19, 2024
If you don't do the project, you don't get the money earmarked for it - pretty simple. But if Stellantis is waiting for demand to materialize, it means they've already decided to be followers. Tesla didn't wait for demand to happen when it built its first Gigafactory 10 years ago. They built it in anticipation of the Model 3 and Y high volume products instead of sitting around watching everyone else do nothing.

1 Reply
- Lou_BC on Sep 19, 2024
  Agreed.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

KOKing I owned a Paul Bracq-penned BMW E24 some time ago, and I recently started considering getting Sacco's contemporary, the W124 coupe.
Bob The answer is partially that stupid manufacturers stopped producing desirable PHEVs.I bought my older kid a beautiful 2011 Volt, #584 off the assembly line and #000007 for HOV exemption in MD. We love the car. It was clearly an old guy's car, and his kids took away his license.It's a perfect car for a high school kid, really. 35 miles battery range gets her to high school, job, practice, and all her friend's houses with a trickle charge from the 120V outlet. In one year (~7k miles), I have put about 10 gallons of gas in her car, and most of that was for the required VA emissions check minimum engine runtime.But -- most importantly -- that gas tank will let her make the 300-mile trip to college in one shot so that when she is allowed to bring her car on campus, she will actually get there!I'm so impressed with the drivetrain that I have active price alerts for the Cadillac CT6 2.0e PHEV on about 12 different marketplaces to replace my BMW. Would I actually trade in my 3GT for a CT6? Well, it depends on what broke in German that week....
ToolGuy Different vehicle of mine: A truck. 'Example' driving pattern: 3/3/4 miles. 9/12/12/9 miles. 1/1/3/3 miles. 5/5 miles. Call that a 'typical' week. Would I ever replace the ICE powertrain in that truck? No, not now. Would I ever convert that truck to EV? Yes, very possibly. Would I ever convert it to a hybrid or PHEV? No, that would be goofy and pointless. 🙂
ChristianWimmer Took my ‘89 500SL R129 out for a spin in his honor (not a recent photo).Other great Mercedes’ designers were Friedrich Geiger, who styled the 1930s 500K/540K Roadsters and my favorite S-Class - the W116 - among others. Paul Bracq is also a legend.RIP, Bruno.
ToolGuy Currently my drives tend to be either extra short or fairly long. (We'll pick that vehicle over there and figure in the last month, 5 miles round trip 3 times a week, plus 1,000 miles round trip once.) The short trips are torture for the internal combustion powertrain, the long trips are (relative) torture for my wallet. There is no possible way that the math works to justify an 'upgrade' to a more efficient ICE, or an EV, or a hybrid, or a PHEV. Plus my long trips tend to include (very) out of the way places. One day the math will work and the range will work and the infrastructure will work (if the range works) and it will work in favor of a straight EV (purchased used). At that point the short trips won't be torture for the EV components and the long trips shouldn't hurt my wallet. What we will have at that point is the steady drip-drip-drip of long-term battery degradation. (I always pictured myself buying generic modular replacement cells at Harbor Freight or its future equivalent, but who knows if that will be possible). The other option that would almost possibly work math-wise would be to lease a new EV at some future point (but the payment would need to be really right). TL;DR: ICE now, EV later, Hybrid maybe, PHEV probably never.