EU Postpones Vote on Combustion-Engine Ban, Germany Asks for Favors

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

eu postpones vote on combustion engine ban germany asks for favors

The European Union is reportedly finding itself in a difficult position ahead of prospective bans on vehicles utilizing internal combustion engines. Germany has threatened to block the agreement, pulling what can only be described as the classic switcheroo in exchange for favorable conditions.

German manufacturers are attempting to market synthetic fuels as a viable and environmentally sound alternative to standard gasoline or diesel. Regulators influenced by the automotive sector are now pressing for the EU to make special exceptions for so-called “electrofuels” before the combustion ban can be finalized – with Italy likewise suggesting it would reject the emission rules everyone agreed to last year.

According to Bloomberg, German Transport Minister Volker Wissing spoke with Frans Timmermans (the man heading the European Commission’s Green Deal and Climate Law) to discuss the proposal ahead of voting.

“If the Commission has a credible stance in conversations with the ministers and the German government I’m optimistic that a solution will be found,” said Sven Giegold, state secretary at Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. “However I can say, and that’s obvious, that the ongoing conversations are difficult.”

From Bloomberg:

The last-minute intervention by Germany’s transport ministry has thrown what would normally be a formality into disarray. Preparations for Tuesday’s vote were postponed until Friday due to Germany threatening to abstain and Italy saying they would reject the CO2 rules agreed last year. Without a qualified majority among member states, the regulation can’t become law.
There is widespread frustration in the European Commission that Germany is raising objections at this stage when it agreed on the council’s position last June. The home to Volkswagen AG and BMW AG took part in a final deal with the parliament in October and balking after a so-called trilogue agreement is highly unusual.
While Italy’s opposition is seen as stubborn, EU officials hope Germany can be persuaded to back down, if it gets assurances that the commission will propose an exemption for climate-neutral synthetic fuels before a scheduled review in 2026.

However, properly assessing whether these synthetic fuels are actually capable of becoming carbon neutral could take ages. Porsche and Siemens have been developing synthetic fuels at a plant in Chile and have suggested that they could reduce the CO2 emissions of internal combustion by around 85 percent. But that’s going to be impossible to prove before Friday’s vote and there have been a lot of allegations being thrown around that German automakers are only pushing “e-fuels” so they can continue selling combustion vehicles.

Though similar arguments could be made about battery electric vehicles, which don’t produce any emissions themselves but are plugged into electrical grids and global supply chains that emit a steady stream of pollution nobody seems interested in looking into. The shallow assumption that these vehicles lack exhaust systems appears to be good enough for most regulators taking the out-of-sight-out-of-mind approach.

Let’s also not forget how Europe’s sudden conviction that widespread diesel use would be better for the environment ended in total disaster. The region had actively been incentivizing “clean diesel” since the 1990s. But the bubble popped in 2015 when Volkswagen was busted for emissions cheating. In the end, it turned out that plenty of automakers were having trouble meeting regulatory targets and had to get creative to avoid government fines. Meanwhile, a second look at Europe’s air quality showed that encouraging everyone to drive diesel vehicles lowered CO2 levels while dramatically increasing particulate matter and NOX emissions.

Synthetic fuels may yield similar unpleasant surprises if embraced before being thoroughly examined.

At a minimum, we know they’ll be significantly more expensive than standard gasoline or diesel. Though costs are supposed to decline as production increases. There are even schemes to mix e-fuel into diesel and gasoline gradually through 2050, to help consumers avoid sticker shock and ensure older engines run into less trouble. But it still sounds like a massive gamble that really only benefits the companies producing synthetic fuels – which are primarily German at the moment – until there’s more hard data that synthetic fuels are truly workable and offer tangible ecological benefits.

German leadership is keen to support the automotive sector, as it represents 5 percent of the national economy. Unfortunately, that figure is poised to come down as widespread electrification requires fewer local suppliers and more battery components to be shipped in from Asia. In fact, Ford announced plans in February to cut about 3,800 jobs across Europe, with workers in Germany being among the hardest hit. Numerous unions (namely IG Metall) have already issued formal complaints to the German government about the employment perils posed by EVs and further economic strife has left political leaders wanting to appear committed to retaining jobs.

“Whoever is serious about climate-neutral mobility must keep all technological options open and also use them,” German Transport Minister Volker Wissing said in an interview with public broadcaster ARD. “I don’t understand this fight against the car and why people want to ban some technologies.”

Keep in mind that Germany was totally on board with widespread vehicle bans last June and allegedly sought no changes to regulations proposed by the European Commission.

[Image: Filmbildfabrik/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Join the conversation
3 of 110 comments
  • El scotto El scotto on Mar 06, 2023

    Y'all can argue about ICE vs EVs all you want to. When it comes to Big Oil, it needs Americans to operate. I'll be laughing my butt off when the Russians try to maintain there oil infrastructure without Americans around. Well, OK Brits too and our hockey loving neighbors to the north also. Oops forgot about the French and Algeria.

    If you're gonna run a large oil project of any kind, you need someone raised in a country were British common law was the foundation of their judiciary.

    Oil, one thing the English-speaking do really, really well.

  • Ollicat Ollicat on Mar 06, 2023

    And another minor inconvenience to EVs - from our friends at the NOT conservative news source -

    • VoGhost VoGhost on Mar 06, 2023

      Oilycat, how much does Big Oil pay you? Come clean with us, won't you?

  • Saeed Hello, I need a series of other accessories from Lincoln. Do you have front window, front and rear lights, etc. from the 1972 and 1976 models
  • Probert Wow - so many digital renders - Ford, Stellantis. - whose next!!! They're really bringing it on....
  • Zerocred So many great drives:Dalton Hwy from Fairbanks to the Arctic Circle.Alaska Marine Highway from Bellingham WA to Skagway AK. it was a multi-day ferry ride so I didn’t actually drive it, but I did take my truck.Icefields Parkway from Jasper AB to Lake Louise AB, CA.I-70 and Hwy 50 from Denver to Sacramento.Hwy 395 on the east side of the Sierras.
  • Aidian Holder I'm not interested in buying anything from a company that deliberately targets all their production in crappy union-busting states. Ford decided to build their EV manufaturing in Tennessee. The company built it there because of an anti-union legal environment. I won't buy another Ford because of that. I've owned four Fords to date -- three of them pickups. I'm shopping for a new one. It won't be a Ford Lightning. If you care about your fellow workers, you won't buy one either.
  • Denis Jeep have other cars?!?