Elon Musk Tweet Leads to Investigation of Tesla

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Stop me if you've heard this before -- Elon Musk tweeted something that has him and/or one of his companies in trouble with regulators.


From CNN: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration confirmed Monday that it is in contact with Tesla about Musk’s tweet in which he “agreed” that Tesla drivers should be allowed to disable the alert reminding them to keep their hands on the steering wheel while in “Full Self Driving” mode, which is a driver assist system in an early “beta” version that does not fully drive the car itself.

On December 31, Musk  replied to a  tweet by @WholeMarsBlog that said “users with more than 10,000 miles on FSD Beta should be given the option to turn off the steering wheel nag.”

“Agreed, update coming in Jan,” Musk replied.

NHTSA says the issue falls under the agency’s  existing investigation into the performance of Tesla’s driver assist systems.

“The investigation opening was motivated by an accumulation of crashes in which Tesla vehicles, operating with Autopilot engaged, struck stationary in-road or roadside first responder vehicles tending to pre-existing collision scenes,” reads the summary of the investigation which opened in June.

The federal inquiry into the tweet was first reported by the Associated Press.

So to recap: Tesla sycophant @WholeMarsBlog suggested that the FSD system lose one of its safety backups -- a system that uses pressure sensors in the steering wheel to make sure a driver is ready to take over if need be -- if the user had accumulated 10,000 miles of using the system. Musk seemed to agree.

Allow me to editorialize further: From a safety perspective, that's not great!

Once again, shouting this from the rooftops: THERE ARE NO SELF-DRIVING CARS FOR SALE TODAY.

I'm not a Luddite or necessarily anti-autonomous driving, but it seems like an unsafe idea to pull back on safety systems when it comes to these semi-autonomous driving systems. Especially when NHTSA is investigating how well these systems work.

Meanwhile, Jalopnik reports that this news broke on the same day that Tesla announced it would be more lenient when it comes to suspending users who are Full-Self Driving Beta testers. In the past, Tesla would boot drivers who weren't attentive enough for six months, now it will just be two weeks. Drivers get repeated warnings via the safety systems before they get the boot. Tesla also opened the program up to all drivers in November -- previously, they had to pass a safety test.

In summary, Tesla seems to be reducing safety backups for its system as it comes under investigation -- and as crashes mount. Insider reports over 750 incidents of unplanned hard braking, as one example.

Meanwhile, a Tesla stopped unexpectedly on San Francisco's Bay Bridge and caused an eight-car pileup that injured a child. Video at the link.

Maybe, just maybe, and hear me out here, we should hit the brakes (pun fully intended) on having customers be beta testers while also reducing safety backups? For the safety of all road users?

My apologies for editorializing a news piece more than I normally do, but it's so tiring to see Musk be so careless regarding the safety not only of Tesla drivers and passengers but the rest of us on the road.

[Image: Tesla]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Mike1041 Mike1041 on Jan 10, 2023

    The man is intent on bankrupting himself it would seem

  • Vulpine Vulpine on Jan 11, 2023

    Just one note on that San Francisco pileup:


    After the crash, the operator of the vehicle CLAIMED he was using FSD, however, the police department investigating the crash did not take the driver's word for it and is withholding judgement until they can access the car's data for themselves; it is not a proven incident at this time, as far as I know.


  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
Next