Biden Administration to Issue More Than Half a Billion Dollars for EV Charging Infrastructure

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Despite a massive cash investment and the government’s push to build more charging stations, the United States’ EV infrastructure needs more work. President Biden’s team aims to improve the situation with even more funding, to the tune of $521 million.


The funds will go to 30 states with a goal of building more chargers in underserved locations. The White House said that there are now more than 192,000 public charging points in the country, almost double the number in 2021, and noted that around 1,000 new chargers come online every week.


Biden promised to build half a million new chargers by 2030, with $7.5 billion in funding coming from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill. Even so, progress has been excruciatingly slow. Earlier this year, the Washington Post reported that the administration’s push had only delivered seven charging stations with 38 plugs.


Funds will be used differently depending on the state, with some areas focusing on building out rural charging infrastructure and installing chargers at multi-unit homes like apartments and condos. California will get $102 million to build a network of chargers and hydrogen fueling stations along commercial freight lines, and Maryland will see $33 million to build chargers in “disadvantaged communities.”

It's easy to bellyache about tax dollars funding something that many people don’t care about or like, but the fact is that the country’s underdeveloped charging network remains a significant hurdle for many people. The lack of charging options for apartment dwellers and people living in sparsely populated regions makes EV ownership difficult or even impossible in some cases, so an improvement in the charging situation will make it possible to get more people behind the wheel of an EV.


[Images: Mark Youso, woodsnorthphoto, Around the World Photos via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 107 comments
  • Tassos Ask me if I care for the idiotic vehicles less than 10% of whose owners use as INTENDED.
  • Brandon The 2024 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4Matic looks like a compelling addition to the luxury sedan market. From the drive notes, it’s clear that Mercedes-Benz has maintained its commitment to blending performance with comfort. The handling and acceleration seem impressive, reflecting Mercedes’ signature blend of power and smoothness.
  • Jmanb52 In this case clearly a driver responsbile for the accident. Lawyer just trying to add confusion to jude and or jury to think about it. I was on a jury once for an auto accident and one of the attorneys tried a few stunts to shift blame. Same thing is happening here. The companies pushing autonamous want to deal with fleet markets like the autonamous taxi companies rather than individual consumers. In my opinion I think they belvie that would be more predictable sales. Car gets to xyz milage time to replace. In my opinion they could never sell a full autonamous car to an individual because of a back and forth legal battles between owner and maker when there is a crash. They need to foget about all these take over driver aids. It is just causing more issues than it could prevent.
  • Jmanb52 Short answer is NO! It has been a tread for manufactures to basicaly glue a tablet to an area of the dash and call it an infotament system. However there is not one of us on here that doesn't ahve a smart phone or tablet. With the android auto, and the Apple Carplay and bluetooth that conencts car spekers and mic to our headset, do we even need an Infotament system or just bluetooth connection to use hands free mic and spearkers or wired connection to USB port for connection to spearkers / mic and charge the phone. So maybe the QOTD should be do manufactures even need to provide an infotanement system or should they just provide an in dash holder for a tablet or smartphone?
  • Jmanb52 In the past year I did some more research on EVs. I already knew for years they were heavier than a ICE car of the same model / class. Like the F150 lightning can be 1000 LBS heavier than its ICE counterpart. In the last year I read more on the size of breaks, tires and other items that take more resrouces to create and polute more in their wear. This was another nail in my corporate EV caufin. I already didn't have much care for them due to my height (over 6 feet) and they all have a bad desgin, over dependency on gimics, over computerized driving experience. If I ever did get one it would be a low range in town only type vehicle that I would convert an older car. There is no manufacture making EVs that is worth a penny of my money.
Next