Rare Rides Icons: The Cadillac Eldorado, Distinctly Luxurious (Part XXX)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

When the 1961 Cadillac Eldorado debuted in its newly diminished state, it wore the company’s more restrained and less finned new styling, and fewer exterior indicators of its special top-of-the-line nature than any previous Eldorado. In our last installment we reviewed the ‘61’s exterior styling, and noted there were only a couple of indicators (badges) that a customer sprung for the Eldorado Biarritz over a standard Sixty-Two. Today we’ll swing open a huge door and see how the Biarritz interior was modernized for the model’s fifth generation. 


(Note: The 1960 Eldorado has a fire engine red interior, while the 1961 is brown and tan.)


There were notable visual updates for the 1961 Eldorado which were likely immediately apparent even to a casual observer of vehicular interiors. The large steering wheel got a new spoke design, as its dual spokes were thickened and received individual twin-spoke design elements. The spokes were also angled downward slightly; in 1960 wheel spokes were horizontal. In the center of the wheel a revised logo appeared that was less recessed than the prior year. 

In a nod to safety, both the brake and accelerator pedals got larger in 1961. Pedals were rectangular in shape, and lost their sculpted design elements in favor of a larger surface area. There was thicker rubber stripping too, to reduce slippage. The parking brake lever at far left remained the same size as in 1960, but was mounted a bit lower for easier visibility and foot reach.

The general design of the dashboard gained a more cohesive horizontal look for 1961. Gone were the driver-oriented pods which separated and concealed most of the controls from the front passenger. All was laid out in clear view, in a move toward simplification and streamlined appearances. 

The speedometer retained its signature horizontal look for 1961, though numbers were larger than the prior year. Ringed more simply in a squared off chrome bezel, the speedo was newly flanked by vertical temperature (left) and fuel (right) indicators. The revised placement of these auxiliary gauges meant they were viewed more easily than when they were smaller and placed under the speedo.

Air conditioning and defrost controls remained in their place underneath the speedo in 1961, with simpler slider bars. Previous vertical switches for things like fan speed became horizontal instead. The ignition was moved lower on the dash in 1961, and was much less prominently placed. The change meant keys were not jingling and hanging high up and close to the driver’s hands.

In the middle of the dash beneath the radio was a new Cadillac plaque, finished in black with silver block lettering. There was no crest on the dashboard in 1961, and there was another notable deletion: An Eldorado plaque that for several years resided in front of the passenger.

Analog clockwork was also relocated in 1961, and moved to the right of the radio. The clock gained larger markings and some Mid-century design elements to its needles. With the current time in easier view of all passengers, all had access to the stereo controls as well. 

The stereo was previously walled off from view of the driver by the clock and ignition pod, but said pod was removed for ‘61. The stereo itself was relocated more centrally, and closer to the driver. Stereo buttons were also updated, with presets altered from a “push in” type to a push down arrangement, like found on an old tape recorder.

Dashboard trim remained the same horizontal ribbed metal design, but there was much less of it in 1961: The dash focused more on control ergonomics and less on design. Ventilation outlets remained in the same place as 1960, but were surrounded by a new lower horizontal design element on the dash. This was most visible in the glove box lid, which adopted a curved shape for 1961.

At the A-pillar there was a less dramatic door shut line and dash shape, as the pillar lost its wraparound design and became more upright. There was no longer room for a power vent window switch at the pillar, so it moved down onto the door panel. Door switch assemblies moved upward slightly in 1961, while the interior door handle received its own cut-out and was separated from the switches.

The door panel’s design was subject to some smaller changes, and included a new metal trim strip. The door pull was relocated from the arm rest and placed within the new chrome trim detail. Red safety lamps at the end of the door panels in 1960 disappeared for 1961. Finally, carpet at the lower third of the door panels was more concealed in 1961 by a revised and thicker chrome strip.

Eldorado’s wide ribbed upholstery with button and strap detailing of 1960 was simplified to smaller vertical ribbing in 1961. The interior looked a bit smoother and more cohesive in 1961. Across all Cadillacs, leather was marketed as “Florentine” that year.

Somewhere between the thick ribbed upholstery of the 1960 Eldorado and the very thin ribbing of the ‘61 was the 1961 Sixty-Two convertible’s interior. Its ribbing was horizontal instead of vertical, and larger than Eldorado Biarritz. It also used some vertical luggage strap detailing.

Unfortunately, that was the only interior difference between the Sixty-Two and much more expensive Eldorado: ribbed detailing measurements on the seats. Unless someone were a very keen reader of the Cadillac brochure, they wouldn’t notice the car that conveyed them was an Eldorado Biarritz.

And that lack of attention to detail on a very expensive product set the tone for the fifth generation Eldorado. In our next installment we’ll take a look at the refresh that happened for its second and final year in fifth-gen guise. After that, we’ll talk pricing and sales figures as we close out the largely forgotten generation. 


[Images: dealer, dealer, dealer, GM]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Cprescott Cprescott on Aug 19, 2024

    ah, the time when Cadillac had designers with working eyesight! Oh how the mighty have fallen!

  • Tassos Tassos on Aug 19, 2024

    NOT ENOUGN WOOD VENEER AND GOLD. I BOUGHT A VILE OF JD VANCE COUCH JUICE TO MAKE MY E-class INTERIOR SMELL FRESHER. IM NOT WEIRD IT’S TOTALLY NORMAL BEHAVIOUR

  • KOKing I owned a Paul Bracq-penned BMW E24 some time ago, and I recently started considering getting Sacco's contemporary, the W124 coupe.
  • Bob The answer is partially that stupid manufacturers stopped producing desirable PHEVs.I bought my older kid a beautiful 2011 Volt, #584 off the assembly line and #000007 for HOV exemption in MD. We love the car. It was clearly an old guy's car, and his kids took away his license.It's a perfect car for a high school kid, really. 35 miles battery range gets her to high school, job, practice, and all her friend's houses with a trickle charge from the 120V outlet. In one year (~7k miles), I have put about 10 gallons of gas in her car, and most of that was for the required VA emissions check minimum engine runtime.But -- most importantly -- that gas tank will let her make the 300-mile trip to college in one shot so that when she is allowed to bring her car on campus, she will actually get there!I'm so impressed with the drivetrain that I have active price alerts for the Cadillac CT6 2.0e PHEV on about 12 different marketplaces to replace my BMW. Would I actually trade in my 3GT for a CT6? Well, it depends on what broke in German that week....
  • ToolGuy Different vehicle of mine: A truck. 'Example' driving pattern: 3/3/4 miles. 9/12/12/9 miles. 1/1/3/3 miles. 5/5 miles. Call that a 'typical' week. Would I ever replace the ICE powertrain in that truck? No, not now. Would I ever convert that truck to EV? Yes, very possibly. Would I ever convert it to a hybrid or PHEV? No, that would be goofy and pointless. 🙂
  • ChristianWimmer Took my ‘89 500SL R129 out for a spin in his honor (not a recent photo).Other great Mercedes’ designers were Friedrich Geiger, who styled the 1930s 500K/540K Roadsters and my favorite S-Class - the W116 - among others. Paul Bracq is also a legend.RIP, Bruno.
  • ToolGuy Currently my drives tend to be either extra short or fairly long. (We'll pick that vehicle over there and figure in the last month, 5 miles round trip 3 times a week, plus 1,000 miles round trip once.) The short trips are torture for the internal combustion powertrain, the long trips are (relative) torture for my wallet. There is no possible way that the math works to justify an 'upgrade' to a more efficient ICE, or an EV, or a hybrid, or a PHEV. Plus my long trips tend to include (very) out of the way places. One day the math will work and the range will work and the infrastructure will work (if the range works) and it will work in favor of a straight EV (purchased used). At that point the short trips won't be torture for the EV components and the long trips shouldn't hurt my wallet. What we will have at that point is the steady drip-drip-drip of long-term battery degradation. (I always pictured myself buying generic modular replacement cells at Harbor Freight or its future equivalent, but who knows if that will be possible). The other option that would almost possibly work math-wise would be to lease a new EV at some future point (but the payment would need to be really right). TL;DR: ICE now, EV later, Hybrid maybe, PHEV probably never.
Next