Junkyard Find: 1963 Dodge Polara 4-door Hardtop

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Chrysler began building cars on the midsize B-Body platform for the 1962 model year, and production continued all the way through the final B-based Cordobas and Magnums in 1979. Today's Junkyard Find is one of the earliest Dodge B-Bodies: a 1963 Polara spotted in a Silicon Valley self-service yard last fall.

The Dodge Dart spent 1962 on the B platform but moved to the smaller A platform starting in 1963. That didn't mean that the Dodge Division was short on B-Bodies that year, though, because each trim level of this car got its own model name.

The cheapest member of the Dodge B family for '63 was the 330, which started at just $2,245 for a two-door sedan with a Slant-6 engine under the hood (about $22,093 in 2023 dollars). Then there was the snazzier 440, which started at $2,381 ($23,432 now).

At the very top of the 1963 Dodge B-Body pyramid was the Polara 500. This car is a one-notch-below-that Polara 4-door hardtop, which started at $2,781 ($27,368 today) and came with a V8 engine as standard equipment.

Plymouth's 1963 siblings of this car were the Savoy, Belvedere and Fury. The '63 Savoy was dirt cheap, priced at $2,206 ($21,710 in 2023 dollars) for the two-door post sedan.

I found a 1963 Polara two-door hardtop in a Colorado yard a couple of years back, but it was in much rougher condition than this four-door.

This car has the kind of rust you see in coastal California, where rainwater sneaks in past rotted weatherstripping and corrodes the trunk floor and lower body.

The interior is what you'd expect to see in a 60-year-old car that spent a decade or three waiting in a yard or driveway for repairs that never came.

The base engine in the 1963 Polara was a 318-cubic-inch (5.2-liter) A-series V8, commonly known as the "Poly 318" for its polyspherical combustion chambers. This car has some flavor of B-series big-block V8; if it's the original engine, then the two-barrel intake tells us we're looking at a 383 (6.3-liter) rated at 305 horsepower and 410 pound-feet. Keep in mind that those are optimistic gross, not net numbers.

Of course, cars like this got engine swaps on a regular basis, so this could be a 361 or 440 or anything in between. I didn't feel like scraping away decades of crud to find casting numbers. The hairiest factory-installed engine available in the 1963 Polara was a Max Wedge 426 with dual four-barrel carburetors and 425 horsepower, but you're not going to find one of those at your local Pick-n-Pull.

The base transmission was a three-speed column-shift manual, but it stands to reason that a Polara shopper willing to pay extra for the big-block engine was also going to insist on an automatic transmission, and that's what we have here.

You can just make out the pushbutton-style gearshift below the gas gauge in this photo.

This clock probably stopped working while LBJ was still in the White House.

Radios sold in the United States between 1953 and 1964 were required to have the CONELRAD nuclear-attack frequencies (640 and 1240 kHz) marked with triangle-in-circle symbols. When no Soviet bombers were on the way, this radio could be used to listen to the hits of 1963 on its scratchy single speaker.

In an ideal world, someone would have saved this car and put it back on the street. The good news is that my friend Belvedere Adrian went and yanked some parts off of it before it faced The Crusher.

If you like 'em tough, quick, smart… see your Dodge dealer for The Dependables.

If your Polara had GoodYear Double Eagle tires, you could drive over land mines and keep going.

[Images: Seller]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 24 comments
  • Spamvw Spamvw on Mar 14, 2023

    Yep it did, had it on a t-shirt in the late sixties as young lad. But the basis for the name was the chassis is what I learned.

    • Jeff S Jeff S on Mar 14, 2023

      That definitely brings back memories. Dodge had some really hot cars in the 60s to the early 70s. Saw a number of these in the parking lot of my high school but the the Road Runner was the most prevalent they were inexpensive new at the time and you could get a fast car. Saw a number of Chevelle SS, Pontiac GTOs, and 442s as well and a few Mustangs but the Road Runners were the popular car to get.


  • Bobbysirhan Bobbysirhan on Mar 14, 2023

    A friend of mine had a car similar to this one almost 30 years ago. The 2 barrel B-series that came standard in his was a 361. It had enough power to have fun sliding around on dirty roads and could even finish a corner on the pavement. IIRC, what killed it off was a failed back axle that couldn't be found in an area parts yard by 1995.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next