Bailout Watch 357: GM Spends $3.3m to Score $13.4b

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

That’s one Hell of a ROI. And in case you hadn’t figured it out, we’re talking about lobbying costs to score bailout bucks. The Wall Street Journal reports GM’s ’08 spend on D.C. power brokering totaled $13.1m. (The $3.3.m spend covers the period of bailout begging.) That’s down from ’07’s $14.3m, but times are tough. Hence the bailout. Anyway, GM spokespinner Greg Martin assured the WSJ that no taxpayers were hurt during the buttering-up of federal legislators. “Lobbying is the transparent and effective way that GM has its voice heard on critical policy issues… that companies should not be required to forfeit if they receive federal funding,” Martin said, endearing himself to taxpayers throughout the country. Martin added that no funds lent from the Treasury would be used for lobbying. Huh? I thought GM promised the SEC yesterday not to cook the books. I mean, from what “ring fenced fund” does the lobbying money come from, pray tell? Ready to listen a bit more of that song “Fool on the Hill?’ Then let’s talk about the recently nationalized GMAC…

“Lobbying spending by GMAC LLC, GM’s auto- and mortgage-lending arm, more than tripled to $4.6 million in 2008 from 2007.” Geez, I wonder why that is? Does that fact that the Treasury department bent the rules so they could become a bank, and then threw $6b of your hard-earned money into the pot have anything to do with it? Yes and no.

“I think it’s obvious that the increased spending on Washington-related activities was related to the environment and the restructuring that we are going through,” opined Toni Simonetti, GMAC’s vice president for global communications. Obvious, yes. And nauseating.

Anyway, Chrysler’s ROI– lobbying vs. bridge loans to nowhere– clocked-in at $3.1m (for the last two financial quarters) on $4b. If these guys could just match this kind of financial performance for their cars and loans, they’d be all set.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • No_slushbox No_slushbox on Jan 23, 2009
    dealmaker: The only people more clueless about making cars than Congress are the Detroit automakers. And the only lies I heard during the Congressional hearings were things like "we are viable", and "this is a loan". Facts are the last thing that the Detroit automakers would want their lobbyists to tell Congress.
  • Dimitris Dimitris on Jan 23, 2009
    Why the selective indignation now? Because for the taxes I have/will pay for it, I didn't buy a car from GM, didn't finance anything from GMAC, and I generally pull my own shots.
  • Lorenzo Heh. The major powers, military or economic, set up these regulators for the smaller countries - the big guys do what they want, and always have. Are the Chinese that unaware?
  • Lorenzo The original 4-Runner, by its very name, promised something different in the future. What happened?
  • Lorenzo At my age, excitement is dangerous. one thing to note: the older models being displayed are more stylish than their current versions, and the old Subaru Forester looks more utilitarian than the current version. I thought the annual model change was dead.
  • Lorenzo Well, it was never an off-roader, much less a military vehicle, so let the people with too much money play make believe.
  • EBFlex The best gift would have been a huge bonfire of all the fak mustangs in inventory and shutting down the factory that makes them.Heck, nobody would even have to risk life and limb starting the fire, just park em close together and wait for the super environmentally friendly EV fire to commence.
Next