avatar

Jon Arnett

By on May 10, 2005

The '05 Chevrolet Cavalier: not a lot of laughs for some owners.Mr. Witzenburg's recent TTAC editorial criticized Mr. Farago for his anti-GM bias and asked us to give the domestic automaker a fair shake. While I respect Mr. Witzenburg's loyalty and patriotism, he seems to have overlooked the fact that his former employer makes some truly awful automobiles. As the cornerstone of his defence, the automotive journalist asked readers to name one– just one– poorly-made car from the General Motors line-up. Alright then, what about the Chevrolet Cavalier?

My best friend, sister and mother all had the displeasure of owning a Cavalier ('94, '00, '04). During their stewardship, pieces fell off, the electronics failed (headlights, windows, and stereo) and there were several major mechanical failures (transmission starter, alternator and master brake cylinder). Witzenburg may dismiss these complaints as relating to an "old" design, but their saga is not peculiar to the Cavalier. Perhaps owners of other GM products would like to email their tales of woe to Mr. Witzenburg. Anyway, a car company is only as good/bad as their weakest model.

Recent Comments

  • dal20402: Teslas have become solidly profitable (on a car-by-car basis) just in the last couple of years. So far,...
  • downunder: First I saw a RIVEN was a photo of one in Sydney on a pallet. Nice looking truck. I don’t know if I...
  • GregLocock: Quick (oratorical) question. Are BEVs actually profitable right now? That is, are the new vehicle buyers...
  • Lou_BC: I can’t see the Lightning selling at a loss. it isn’t as if any of this is new technology....
  • Lou_BC: Factory installed usually means twice as expensive as aftermarket.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber