Australian Cruze Expensive, Unnecessary

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The Australian federal government has hopped on the auto bailout bandwagon, “investing” $149m in production of a Holden-badged GM compact car. The South Australia state government will kick in $30m as well, as the Delta-platformed Cruze-alike will be produced near Adelaide. Styling and engineering will be carried out in Melbourne. And what do the Australian people get for their representatives’ fiscal abandon? According to Adelaide Now, the project will “support” 600 GM jobs and 600 supplier jobs, but it seems that these will likely not be new hires. Money for the project comes from Australia’s “Green Car Innovation Fund,” and its use is being justified by the possibility of ethanol, LPG and CNG powertrains at some indeterminate point in the future. “We recognise the needs and desires of motorists are evolving with growing concern around environmental factors and shifting consumer sentiment,” says Holden Chairman Mark Reuss. “Such evolution calls for an innovative approach… (and) the new vehicle will cater for growing demand for smaller cars focussed on economy.” when all is said and done though, the environmental issues are simply a greenwash for Australia to prop up weakening production and subsidize a “domestic” Corolla competitor. Sound familiar? The irony is that the GM doesn’t especially need a bespoke version of its global Cruze for Australia, although it will be required to match the government’s $149m outlay.

With the government picking up half the development cost it’s worth doing, but besides competing in Australia’s brutal small-car market there’s no real upside to the project. The alt-fuel talk is window dressing, there’s no chance of an export niche version, and GM is already ramping up to produce the Cruze in Europe, The US and Korea. There’s no good business reason to not import Cruzes from Korea… except for government “job-supporting” and green posturing. Sounds worth it.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Cthill Cthill on Dec 22, 2008
    If there’s a recognized demand for such a car, wouldn’t the car manufacturers already be making it? Oh wait, they are; just not GM/Holden. Well, at least it’s not my money being wasted this time. There is a recognised demand for small cars and all major makers are already in the market. Toyota Corolla, Holden (Opel) Astra, Ford Focus etc. None of which are now built in Australia. The question is whether it is worth spending tax payers money to have the cars manufactured in Australia.
  • Gover Gover on Dec 23, 2008

    Great the australian governments paying for half of the cars development. Where's GM getting the other half of the money from? The US taxpayer.

  • El Kevarino There are already cheap EV's available. They're called "used cars". You can get a lightly used Kia Niro EV, which is a perfectly functional hatchback with lots of features, 230mi of range, and real buttons for around $20k. It won't solve the charging infrastructure problem, but if you can charge at home or work it can get you from A to B with a very low cost per mile.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
Next