Hyundai's Smallest CUV Probably Out-MPGs Your Car

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The Hyundai Venue, a bottom-rung, A-segment crossover of such a diminutive size that you’d be forgiven for thinking it showed up in the wrong market by accident, has undergone testing by the Environmental Protection Agency.

Stretching one inch less than a Kia Rio hatch when measured stem to stern, the Venue is part of Hyundai’s effort to eliminate white space in its U.S. lineup while providing young car buyers with an attainable place to start climbing the Hyundai product ladder. These buyers, the EPA confirms, will not have to worry about lofty fuel bills.

Offered only as a front-drive runabout (can you hear the Venue’s siren song, urban Millennials?), the Venue’s fuel economy is pretty much what Hyundai engineers predicted when the Venue rolled into this year’s New York Auto Show.

When equipped with a continuously variable automatic (which Hyundai calls an “intelligent variable transmission”), the Venue earns a rating of 30 mpg city, 34 mpg highway, and 32 mpg combined. Outfitted with a six-speed manual (yes, you read that right), MPGs fall to 27 city, 35 highway, and 30 combined. The Venue’s EPA numbers were first noticed by Autoblog.

Overall, the Venue is clearly Hyundai’s answer to the low-priced, FWD-only Nissan Kicks, which landed on the scene last year with a starting price under $18,000. Well-appointed and offering all the tech goodies and niceties a twentysomething iPhone devotee could desire, the Venue draws its motivation from a Smartstream 1.6-liter four-cylinder that’s good for an estimated 121 horsepower and 113 lb-ft of torque.

A powerhouse it ain’t, but Hyundai engineers have spend a great deal of time optimizing this mill for greater efficiency. The same goes for the IVT gearbox. In base SE trim, the Venue tips the scales at 2,557 pounds, rising to just over 2,700 lbs in uplevel SEL guise, so there isn’t a massive amount of bulk to haul around.

Indeed, the Venue only suffers in terms of aerodynamics when compared to low-end Hyundai vehicles. Its combined fuel economy is actually 2 mpg higher (when equipped with IVT) than a manual-transmission Elantra, and only 1 mpg less than a stick-shift Accent. While the larger Kicks earns a 33 mpg combined rating, other import subcompact crossovers can’t match the Venue’s thriftiness.

We now know what to expect from the Venue in terms of efficiency, but its pricing remains a mystery. Not for long, though. First-drive reviews are coming out, and details on dollar figures should arrive in advance of the model’s late-2019 on-sale date.

[Images: Hyundai]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 16 comments
  • Dal20402 Dal20402 on Sep 30, 2019

    Shrug. The primary reason to get a subcompact CUV is to have a cheap-to-operate car with a SUV image. I don't care about a SUV image, so I don't care about this class. I own a bigger CUV, and the reason I have it instead of a sedan is entirely about interior space, of which you don't get much in the subcompact class.

    • Featherston Featherston on Oct 01, 2019

      The one thing I'll say for the subcompact CUV class is that it manages to combine decent-for-2019 rear headroom with a short overall length. That's a rare combination in the present market. I'd rather sit in the back of a (subcompact) Mazda CX-3 than the (compact) 3, for example. There still are some non-CUVs that buck that trend, though. The Jetta and Golf have nice rear headroom, and (surprisingly) I found the 3 sedan to be acceptable whereas the 3 hatch was not.

  • Vvk Vvk on Sep 30, 2019

    Reminds me of Volvo XC40. I like it.

  • 3-On-The-Tree I had a 69 Thunderbird with a 429 and it did the same thing.
  • Lou_BC No. An EV would have to replace my primary vehicle. That means it has to be able to do everything my current vehicle does.
  • Bkojote @Lou_BC I don't know how broad of a difference in capability there is between 2 door and 4 door broncos or even Wranglers as I can't speak to that from experience. Generally the consensus is while a Tacoma/4Runner is ~10% less capable on 'difficult' trails they're significantly more pleasant to drive on the way to the trails and actually pleasant the other 90% of the time. I'm guessing the Trailhunter narrows that gap even more and is probably almost as capable as a 4 Door Bronco Sasquatch but significantly more pleasant/fuel efficient on the road. To wit, just about everyone in our group with a 4Runner bought a second set of wheels/tires for when it sees road duty. Everyone in our group with a Bronco bought a second vehicle...
  • Aja8888 No.
  • 2manyvettes Since all of my cars have V8 gas engines (with one exception, a V6) guess what my opinion is about a cheap EV. And there is even a Tesla supercharger all of a mile from my house.
Next