U.S. to GM: Sorry, Pay Your Buick Envision Tax

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Pity the poor Buick Envision. As one of the few Chinese-built vehicles sold in America, it earned an unpatriotic stigma upon its arrival. There’s no word on how many UAW workers own one. Meanwhile, the compact crossover launched partway through the 2016 model year with only high-end trims in tow, saddling it with a steep starting price. The entry price has since declined to saner levels.

Just when Buick thought it had righted the Envision ship, the U.S. hiked tariffs on a slew of Chinese goods to 25 percent last July, suddenly making the Envision a less profitable endeavor for the doctor’s car brand. As we learned today, General Motors’ appeal for mercy apparently fell on deaf ears.

As reported by CNBC, the Trump administration denied an exemption request filed by GM immediately following the tariff hike. The unhappy news came via a letter sent late last month from the U.S. Trade Representative’s office

In it, GM was told the Envision is “a product strategically important or related to ‘Made in China 2025’ or other Chinese industrial programs.”

With its request denied, GM will be forced to continue eating the tariff, as the automaker chose not to raise the Envision’s price to offset the levy. In fact, Envision prices fell for 2019. GM did, however, decide to stop importing the plug-in hybrid variant of Cadillac’s CT6. Announced last November, the Chinese-built CT6 Plug-in disappeared from the U.S. lineup for 2019, though it’s still available to buyers in its home country. Unlike the CT6 Plug-in, the Envision has both volume and segment importance going for it.

Facelifted for the 2019 model year and carrying a nine-speed automatic on upper, turbocharged trims, the Envision range starts under $35,000 (after destination) for a base, front-drive model. Incentives are available, with Buick currently listing the cheapest model at $31,995 before destination.

In the first quarter of 2019, Envision sales fell 21.4 percent in the United States.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 46 comments
  • Golden2husky Golden2husky on Jun 06, 2019

    These tarrifs are a disaster for consumers. Past week I bought two 10' lengths of 2 inch rigid steel conduit....$120!!!! Trump go F yourself. Great sign on protest in Britan "All in All the Prick Has no Wall" Roger Waters must be pleased!!!

    • See 2 previous
    • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Jun 06, 2019

      What was the pre tariff price? This is beyond meaningless without that.

  • Akear Akear on Jun 07, 2019

    Mary Barra lost Trump's good will when she closed the Cruze plant.

  • 28-Cars-Later One of the biggest reasons not to purchase an EV that I hear is...that they just all around suck for almost every use case imaginable.
  • Theflyersfan A cheaper EV is likely to have a smaller battery (think Mazda MX-30 and Mitsubishi iMEV), so that makes it less useful for some buyers. Personally, my charging can only take place at work or at a four-charger station at the end of my street in a public lot, so that's a crapshoot. If a cheaper EV was able to capture what it seems like a lot of buyers want - sub-40K, 300+ mile range, up to 80% charging in 20-30 minutes (tops) - then they can possibly be added to some lists. But then the issues of depreciation and resale value come into play if someone wants to keep the car for a while. But since this question is asking person by person, if I had room for a second car to be garaged (off of the street), I would consider an EV for a second car and keep my current one as a weekend toy. But I can't do a 50K+ EV as a primary car with my uncertain charging infrastructure by me, road trips, and as a second car, the higher insurance rates and county taxes. Not yet at least. A plug in hybrid however is perfect.
  • 28-Cars-Later Neither, but Honda lost the plot a while back in my view so Rav it would be.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Nope. Still not interested.
  • 28-Cars-Later I know someone who would snap this up for the right money, but Ontario and likely the ask would prohibit it.
Next